Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
While I can understand your inclusion of the horizontal planks for size reference, I find them to detract from the overall image. It looks like a splice of 3 different images here.
I think the one nail head nearest the spider is sufficient to give it that itsy bitsy aspect. Might I suggest that this one may have had more impact as a portrait shot.
While I can understand your inclusion of the horizontal planks for size reference, I find them to detract from the overall image. It looks like a splice of 3 different images here.
I think the one nail head nearest the spider is sufficient to give it that itsy bitsy aspect. Might I suggest that this one may have had more impact as a portrait shot.
Cooling looking spider btw :thumbsup:
Funny, but I did have a shot like that (portrait, that is), but thought this would be better-----wrong again:mad2:
There's never a right nor wrong way to express something. Just different ways to communicate and interpret.
I interpret this image as vertical only because of the vertical orientation of the spider and vertical orientation of the grain pattern around the spider. Now if the spider was turned 90 degrees, I have no idea what I would have done