High St.

[Tuna]

[Mr Yuck]

Trippy. Very cool illusion. I love how the one that looks real at first glance is not the real one, and the one that appears to be a reflection is the real thing...crazy.

[Frog]

I shouldn't have read Mr. Yuck's comments first as I didn't or don't know that its two images.
Whatever it is, I like it. I'm attracted to the image initially because of composition and the contrast and then I start picking out details.
If I had to nit-pik I'd say I don't like the color of the sky at top left.

[MB1]

I'm thinking this would be a great advertising image.

[Overbeyond]

Interesting and eerily attractive but I think the colouring, for instance in one of the window frames as an example, just doesn't work for me anyway.

[Greg McCary]

I'll say it again. You are in a league all to yourself. Knowing that you shoot film this shows great control of the lighting. Well done again.
Greg

[GB1]

Tuna - It's neat, but I find there to be too many distracting objects in the foreground. The objects themselves aren't bad but they're arranged in a conflicting way and are too dark to tell me what they are etc. Some might find that inviting, but for whatever reason it just makes me want to move to the next shot. Sorry.

G

[engineer]

I agree with GB1...if it was a story and one could see a connection between the objects inside with the guy outside, then the foreground is o.k....now i look very long and twice (which is not a bad thing though), but I cannot figure out what the story is.

[engineer]

i have been thinking what object i would like to see on the table, I am not sure, just something weird maybe..