Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
I like the second shot a lot, as well as it's counterpart in the other thread, but I'm w/ Janie on that last one, the pop of color is outstanding, even more amazing is how well you naiked the exposure - this one could easily have blown out in a dozen different places, but you nailed it (also like the composition with the trunk placement within the frame)
I think the first doesn't have enough depth of field with the focal point somewhere in the middle.
The second seems much better and your b/w conversion stands out better. I'd like a different composition at more of an angle but hard to tell not having been there. I'd also like to see something else in the photo.
Chris - Good concepts and originality, which is the most important thing IMO. The first three's technical execution isn't the best though: focus isn't on a good spot in # 1, the pic's way too soft in # 2 (a REAL shame since it's a neat shot !!), and # 3 seems a bit soft too (it would also be better in color). # 4 is a winner - nice placement of the tree in the frame, great color and "pop".. it also seems like an abstract
G
Photography Software and Post Processing Forum Moderator. Visit here!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Feel free to edit and repost my photos as part of your critique.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Janie
