Photo Critique Forum

Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
Featured Photo
Photo by hminx

Photo by hminx
Featured Photo Archive >>
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or off-topic will be removed.
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, mn
    Posts
    11

    Fall on the St. Louis River, MN

    Took this photo this past weekend on a hiking trip to Jay Cooke State Park in northern, MN. Photo was taken with a canon Xsi and the 18-55 kit lens. Some PP done in Photomatix and cropping done in Photoshop.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Fall on the St. Louis River, MN-hdr_stlouisriver_lowres.jpg  

  2. #2
    Re Member LeeIs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    3,403

    Re: Fall on the St. Louis River, MN

    Hellow paul. the shot looks very soft. I really can't see anything in focus. Photomatrix sounds like the culprit here. I'm actually debating with myself whether to get it or not. It's a great software for HDR, the photoshop plug just doesn't cut it for me and I might actually get the photomatrix which is much better.

    I think this shot is way out of focus man, with no central 'draw me in' area.
    Liban

    "There is nothing like returning to a place that remains unchanged to find the ways in which you yourself have." Nelson Mandela

    Nikon Samurai #23 - The Alexei Ponikarovsky of PR

    Havana Cuba Photography

  3. #3
    Senior Member jetrim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Ft. Lauderdale
    Posts
    3,229

    Re: Fall on the St. Louis River, MN

    I think maybe a little higher angle of attack might have done wonders for this photo. You have a very nice bend in the river which would give it the central "draw me in" area Leels spoke of, if it didn't get so lost in rocks, reflections, and brush. This may not be possible, as it seems like you are already shooting from standing height, looking uphill, but getting the camera an extra 2 to 3 feet higher probably would have made all the difference in the world.

  4. #4
    Powder River Imaging EOSThree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Like no place on earth
    Posts
    1,327

    Re: Fall on the St. Louis River, MN

    The colors are great, the subject has some interest. The photo is soft, the sky has a funky blotchy look.

    I agree with Lee that Photomatix is probably the trouble here. I am guessing you handheld these and that resulted in three slightly different images. Try using the "align by matching features" this will help eliminate the shake errors.
    Rule books are paper they will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal. --Ernie Gann--
    What is a cynic? A man who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing. --Oscar Wilde--

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, mn
    Posts
    11

    Re: Fall on the St. Louis River, MN

    Thanks for all the input. The hi-res image on my mac is perfectly in focus. I'm guessing somewhere along the down sizing for uploading the image lost its crispness(user error). I'll have to double check that and repost. Photomatix definitely caused a little softness as I used a single image and just did some tone adjustments to boost color a bit.

    Photomatix is definitely to blame for the blotchy sky. Before it was overcast and much lighter. This was my first time using this program.

    Good tips. Now i'll have to drive a couple hours to reshoot the pic.
    Last edited by PaulasaurusRex; 10-16-2008 at 05:49 AM.

  6. #6
    project forum co-moderator Frog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    wa state
    Posts
    11,195

    Re: Fall on the St. Louis River, MN

    The first thing I noticed was the nice colors but then I saw it looks flat and also agree with all the above.
    Why did you use photomatix on a single image?
    Was it shot in raw format?
    If so, I think you could adjust exposure up and down 3 stops and then use those 3 images for hdr though I'm not sure if that works or not.
    Keep Shooting!

    CHECK OUT THE PHOTO PROJECT FORUM
    http://forums.photographyreview.com/...splay.php?f=34

    Please refrain from editing my photos without asking.

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, mn
    Posts
    11

    Re: Fall on the St. Louis River, MN

    The reason I used photomatix on a single image was, well just for the heck of it. I was putting together bracketed images and getting ok results and was just curious to see what would happen with a single image converted to HDR then adjusted with Tone Mapping and voila, I got the above image.

    I did not shoot the image in RAW so I can't adjust it as you suggested. Unfortunately.

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sleepy Eye, MN
    Posts
    14

    Re: Fall on the St. Louis River, MN

    sorry for alittle off topic-ness heh.. but i noticed sort of the same softness with my xsi and kit lens when shooting landscape type pictures... i was using AF and had the picture style set to "Landscape".. i did noticed that when i brought the pic into Digital Photo Professional ( software that came with the camera ) that the sharpness was at 0 / 500..

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •