Photo Critique Forum

Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
Featured Photo
Photo by hminx

Photo by hminx
Featured Photo Archive >>
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or off-topic will be removed.
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Fall Cliff

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    45

    Fall Cliff

    Critique and editting are welcome. Besides the sky being burnt out in some areas what do you see?


    Details:
    Nikon D90
    Sigma 10-20 @ 10mm
    1/100, @ F14
    ISO 200
    Aperture priority

    Nikon D90
    -Nikkor 18-200VR
    -Sigma 10-20mm

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    45

    Re: Fall Cliff

    24 views and nothing? No comments? It sucks, it's good, etc. lol Composition? Anything?
    Nikon D90
    -Nikkor 18-200VR
    -Sigma 10-20mm

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    va
    Posts
    430

    Re: Fall Cliff

    This is purely from a technical standpoint:

    The sky is over exposed in some areas and the rock/tree is mostly underexposed. If you like that or that was your intention, then ignore this. If you would have rather had a nice blue sky with clouds that have texture and rocks that aren't dark, here are some tips....

    You can fix this to an extent in post processing (photoshop) using a few layers. So you'd make at least 2 copies of the main image, then fix the sky on one layer and the rock/tree on another. erase (using a layer mask) the appropriate parts to make the whole scene well exposed. I would use Curves or Levels attached to a clipping mask (so it only affects the layer under it) to fix this.

    Now, that method is going to add some noise or ruin details in your photo, sometimes is hard to do, and on most images that are really under/overexposed it won't help enough. This imo should be a last resort.

    Next you can fix it by doing HDR (which is similar method to the post processing except you take multiple exposureses). So you'd expose for the sky, the top of the trees, the rock, and maybe the background mountain. Then you merge those together and fine tune (there are programs like Photomatix that do this automatically or you could use layer masks in photoshop)

    .... Now if you don't like the computer or feel that it's cheating you can expose for the sky and then use a flash to light up the foreground. So you expose for the sky and then use a flash aimed at the rock/tree trunk to light them up enough to match the sky's brightness a little better.

    Or you can wait until a better time of day when the light isn't going to cause such intense shadows/highlights. It's called the Golden Hour and ~15 mins before sunrise to ~45 minutes after sunrise and again ~45 minutes before sunset to ~15 minutes after sunset. The sky will be a bit darker and hopefully require roughly the same exposure as the rock. Also... Perhaps if you waited until sunset or sunrise, the sun would be shining on this part of the rock (which is in a shadow). Although if this is the north face of the rock (and you're in the northern hemisphere), you're SOL.

    You can also use a neutral density gradient filter. It's a filter that goes over your lenses and ~half of it has a gradient that blocks light. So it will underexpose half the photo to even out exposure issues. So say at sunset taking a picture of the horizon the ground needs 10s of exposure and the sky/sun needs 1s... The ND gradient filter will make it so you just use 10s and everything comes out evenly exposed. There are different strengths and I believe you can rotate them. So like here you could rotate it so the dark side covers the sky and then exposure for the foreground.

    There are probably other methods but I think picking a better time to shoot, filters, and HDR are the most popular.
    Last edited by caleb; 10-20-2009 at 04:03 PM.

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    45

    Re: Fall Cliff

    Thank you very much!
    Nikon D90
    -Nikkor 18-200VR
    -Sigma 10-20mm

  5. #5
    Senior Member jetrim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Ft. Lauderdale
    Posts
    3,229

    Re: Fall Cliff

    Don't know that I could add anything to Caleb's excellent tutorial. It seems you were able to identify the trouble spots yourself before posting which is a very good thing - now you also know how to avoid/correct them going forward, also a very good thing. Regarding composition, I think you have a pretty good handle on this one, the wide angle was a good choice as the distortion at the tree tops adds interest. Even out the over and undre exposed portions and I think you have a really good shot here.

    P.S. ~ I was NOT one of the original 24 views

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •