Photo Critique Forum

Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
Featured Photo
Photo by hminx

Photo by hminx
Featured Photo Archive >>
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or off-topic will be removed.
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: dusk

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    10

    dusk

    Taken just a couple hours ago. Today was my first day with my new 30D.
    What do I need to do in the future to capture the sunset (since it's over-exposed here) and still have a long enough exposure for everything else to show up in the image?


    Feel free to edit my posted photos to help me learn.

  2. #2
    project forum co-moderator Frog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    wa state
    Posts
    11,195

    Re: dusk

    Overexposed?

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    San Diego, Ca.
    Posts
    64

    Re: dusk

    That doesn't look overexposed to me.

  4. #4
    Captain of the Ship Photo-John's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
    Posts
    15,422

    Post-Processing

    This is a very good exposure. I think it's your expectations that need to be adjusted. There's a certain amount of range your camera can capture - and that's that. If there's something you want to appear differently in this scene, you're gonna have to start doing some post processing. The first thing to do is shoot RAW so that you have more information to work with. The next step is to start taking advantage of that extra information in Photoshop. I use masked adjustment layers on all of my images so that I can selectively fine-tune the contrast and density of different parts of the photo. In the case of this photo, if you want the low, bright part of the sky to have more info, I'd shoot it darker and then brighten up the rest of the photo with a levels adjustment. Then I'd mask the bright area so that mu adjustment left it alone.
    Photo-John

    Your reviews are the foundation of this site - Write A Review!

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    10

    Re: dusk

    Thanks John. That's helpful information.
    Shooting and processing RAW is something I plan to begin learning this weekend. I just got my camera a week ago, so I wanted to get a handle on the camera before diving in to something else.
    Feel free to edit my posted photos to help me learn.

  6. #6
    GB1
    GB1 is offline
    Moderator GB1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    San Diego CA
    Posts
    9,960

    Re: dusk

    It might be just a tad too bright in the center area. Otherwise, very interesting composition. It could use just a little more happening on the left side, but otherwise I like it. I think its close on the right but maybe a tad underexposed.

    Smelly, check out this pic on a new technique on getting all the objects the correct exp. I havent tried it yet.

    http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5153168
    Photography Software and Post Processing Forum Moderator. Visit here!

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Feel free to edit and repost my photos as part of your critique.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    My Site

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •