Photo Critique Forum

Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
Featured Photo
Photo by hminx

Photo by hminx
Featured Photo Archive >>
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or off-topic will be removed.
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    21

    Don't ride off that cliff.

    This picture was taken in Southern Utah. The cliff to the left of the rider was approximately a 1,000 foot vertical drop.

    I touched the photo up in photoshop and am displaying both pictures here.
    This first picture is edited, the second is the original.


    My main issue is getting the cliff ledge to stand out as to better demonstrate the sheer drop off.


    Any ideas on the shot in general or on how I used photoshop would be great.

    Thanks!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Don't ride off that cliff.-gooseberry-mesa-011_edit_old.jpg   Don't ride off that cliff.-gooseberry-mesa-011_old.jpg  

  2. #2
    Senior Member jkriminger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Davie, Fl
    Posts
    1,202

    Re: Don't ride off that cliff.

    maybe layer the foreground and background seperately and enhance the background less.
    Please ask to edit photos and I'll do the same! :thumbsup:
    Thx, Rod
    http://krimingerphotography.printroom.com

  3. #3
    mod squad gahspidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    N.Y. U.S.A.
    Posts
    8,368

    Re: Don't ride off that cliff.

    Great looking scene and good shot. i like the original much better than the saturated version. It would have been nice to have caught the action as the biker was a few more feet down the trail to seperate him further from the tree and stand out a little stronger. Still, very good.
    I think jkriminger is right about selecting the fg and enhance it slightly while reducing the brightness of the background. Make sure you select the jagged edges of the rocks at the cliffs edge in the process.
    nice shot
    please do not edit and repost my photos


    gary


  4. #4
    MB1
    MB1 is offline
    The Skeptical Photographer MB1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Washington, DC and Clermont, FL
    Posts
    3,144

    Re: Don't ride off that cliff.

    I like the saturated version. As to how you would get greater seperation between the foreground and background I'd say the correct way would be in camera with focal points and depth of field.

  5. #5
    Senior Member jkriminger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Davie, Fl
    Posts
    1,202

    Re: Don't ride off that cliff.

    ahhh..but then you would lose that beautiful background
    Please ask to edit photos and I'll do the same! :thumbsup:
    Thx, Rod
    http://krimingerphotography.printroom.com

  6. #6
    banished Don Schaeffer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Huntington, NY
    Posts
    5,816

    Re: Don't ride off that cliff.

    I like the saturated version much better than the original. It has so much more impact and life.

  7. #7
    The Polariser fx101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    652

    Re: Don't ride off that cliff.

    You will need to mask out the background. If you don't have it already try fluidmask (3 is the latest version I believe). You will be able to select around the trees and the rocks. Then work with both images seperately (foreground and background). Increase the gamma in the background to really bring out the blacks and if you want use curves to tone it down. Then work with the saturation to get the sky just right. Then do what you need to with the foreground. Combine both images and see how it looks. If you require more distinction, try using a lens-blur filter. BTW I like the look of the saturated one more.
    --The camera's role is not to interfere with the photographer's work--

    --Cibachrome: It's like printing on gold.

    --Edit my photos as part of your commentary if you want to.--

  8. #8
    Senior Member freygr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Portland, OR, USA
    Posts
    2,522

    Re: Don't ride off that cliff.

    Quote Originally Posted by romelm
    This picture was taken in Southern Utah. The cliff to the left of the rider was approximately a 1,000 foot vertical drop.

    clip...
    Well I'm surprised no one has ridden off the cliff. Where I live the protect the public would try to close the trail as it's too dangerous. Last winter when the three climbers died on Mt. Hood you just could hear why did we let them go there it's too dangerous.
    GRF

    Panorama Madness:

    Nikon D800, 50mm F1.4D AF, 16-35mm, 28-200mm & 70-300mm

  9. #9
    AutoX Addict Mr Yuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    1,387

    Re: Don't ride off that cliff.

    beautiful shot. I agree with the others that you should enhance the foreground separately from the background, it would give a greater sense of something...depth I think. I do like the edited version though, I'd have the foreground enhanced that much, the background just a little less.
    <><
    Flickr
    --Rebel T2i
    --Sigma 10-20mm
    --Canon EF-S 55-250mm
    --Tamron 17-50mm F2.8

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •