Photo Critique Forum

Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
Featured Photo
Photo by hminx

Photo by hminx
Featured Photo Archive >>
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or off-topic will be removed.
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    misanthrope
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    315

    Did I do this right? Dragonfly macro

    Yes, it's already dead. I set it on a white sheet near a window and then cranked the aperture down as far as it could go with the available light. Then I fired a few hits from my flash unit off-camera (not connected) from overhead. It was a pretty dim foggy day, so the camera wouldn't let me get any more aperture. As it was, I set it to about f/27 or so. I think I could use a little more DOF, but who knows? Having never done it before, it was an experiment. I think I did okay. Any suggestions?
    Elan 7N, Sigma 70-300, 2X converter, Provia 100F.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    "We've all been raised by television to believe that one day we'll all be millionaires and movie gods and rock stars -- but we won't. And we're slowly learning that fact. And we're very, very pissed off."

    -Fight Club, Chuck Palahniuk

  2. #2
    GoldMember Lava Lamp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,422
    Quote Originally Posted by Outdoorsman
    Yes, it's already dead. I set it on a white sheet near a window and then cranked the aperture down as far as it could go with the available light. Then I fired a few hits from my flash unit off-camera (not connected) from overhead. It was a pretty dim foggy day, so the camera wouldn't let me get any more aperture. As it was, I set it to about f/27 or so. I think I could use a little more DOF, but who knows? Having never done it before, it was an experiment. I think I did okay. Any suggestions?
    Elan 7N, Sigma 70-300, 2X converter, Provia 100F.
    I think you did okay, too. I've tried to photograph dragonflies before with disappointing results. For one thing, I can never get the detail in the eyes I want, and for another, they are so big (relative to other bugs) you end up cropping them kind of awkwardly. I think both these problems apply to your photo, but if it were mine, I'd feel like it was a very good start.

  3. #3
    Gone Fishing Tuna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Glen Allen, VA
    Posts
    1,141
    Nicely done. I think it looks good. Especially since you burst it with flash which usually adds too harsh a light in situations like this. The light here looks more diffused allowing the colors and highlights to stand out. More DOF would be nice but you have a decent amount here. My only suggestion might be, since you have absolute control of the subject, to shoot from a different angle to eliminate the blurry tail(?) in the background or to pose him/her on a more natural setting.

    Tuna

  4. #4
    misanthrope
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    315
    Hey, thanks guys! Lava Lamp, you seem to be the insect macro guru here, so I really appreciate your comments. And tuna, thanks also for the idea- I still have the little guy, so I should wait for a sunnier day and get the max DOF I can (f/32) and make it look a little more natural. I think this has a sort of clinical look to it- some greenery might just make for a winner.
    I keep a diffuser on my flash at all times (see my flash diffuser post in help files), since I hate harsh flash lighting. I tried to keep it a good distance away to avoid badly overexposing. And hey, Provia is the sh!t, is it not? I went to the shop and ran it though the Agfa pro scanner, and the detail I can get out of this slide is incredible. I zoomed in VERY far in PS and found tiny little hairs and dirt that I had no idea were even on the bug. A pro lens would really make the most of this film, but who can afford a pro macro? The Sigma is designed for close focusing, but it's still not a true macro, even at 1:2.
    Thanks again guys!!!
    "We've all been raised by television to believe that one day we'll all be millionaires and movie gods and rock stars -- but we won't. And we're slowly learning that fact. And we're very, very pissed off."

    -Fight Club, Chuck Palahniuk

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •