Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
I have a total lack of respect for anything connected with society, except that which makes the roads safer, the beer stronger, the food cheaper, and the old men and old women warmer in the winter and happier in the summer. Brendan Behan
Very nice color but the missing lower half of the photo detracts. The photo either needs to eliminate the lower tail light altogether or include it all. Love the color and chrome though.
Yoyo, Overb, C.F,,Chow CC, thank you all for taking the time to comment!
I never thought about the Nike symbol.
Glad the color worked with the chrome accents.
Cutting the light with the frame was a conscious decision when I made the image. I'm fairly comfortable with it this way. I do agree based on some other variants of the photo that it works well without the light. However, I then lose the chrome accents and significantly change the composition. May be less of the light would still provide an anchoring effect and retain the contrast with the red and chrome. Hmmmm
Using the full light also changes it and I fell that it is less abstract that way. Decisions, decisions . . .
Glad to know how each of you feels and thanks again for your comments.