Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
Nice one. I do remember this picture but I couldn't say if I prefer the original or that one. The original didn't had that much grain if I remember well (I have no issue with the grain, that's just an observation).
I hate to be the only one to say it but,,,,,,,, I think it is a little to slow. If you hadn't told me it was a dancer I would have had a hard time figuring it out. Sorry Tune I got to give you a thumbs down on this one.
I Like the abstract and the way the colours work in this picture, looks like a terrific dance performance.
Roger
"I hope we will never see the day when photo shops sell little schema grills to clamp onto our viewfinders; and the Golden Rule will never be found etched on our ground glass."from The mind's eye by Henri Cartier-Bresson
My Web Site: www.readingr.com DSLR
Canon 5D; EF100-400 F4.5-5.6L IS USM; EF24-70 F2.8L USM 50mm F1.8 II; EF 100 F2.8 Macro Digital
Canon Powershot Pro 1; Canon Ixus 100
I would have liked the tempo to have been upped a little just to give us a little more of the dancers shape. Having said that the ever so slow waltz has given us a feast of colour and shape. I do think the grain/noise is also a little top heavy and a slight reduction in Neat Image or the likes might help here. Unfortunately I find that these noise reduction programmes tend to soften/melt the colours too much sometimes.
Tom
I have a total lack of respect for anything connected with society, except that which makes the roads safer, the beer stronger, the food cheaper, and the old men and old women warmer in the winter and happier in the summer. Brendan Behan