Caught in mid flight

[ChowChi-Ching]

This is our new kitten Bounder........

[CLKunst]

This is our new kitten Bounder........

Yes, he certainly is! Fun shot Chow, for critique of this image alone I would say it needs a crop. But even more fun, really work with your new kitty and see if you can re-create the circumstances so that you could catch her from another angle. Like underneath!

[dennylee60]

This is a cool picture. I would agree that a tighter crop would be nice.

[readingr]

Well caught,

A bit busy and I agree with the crop - Is it my eyes or is the cat a bit out of focus?

Roger

[ChowChi-Ching]

Thanks! I think that I will have to play around with him, and try some different angles. I like the idea of underneath. He plays like this every night so it shouldn't be too hard to get. (LOL, Now it will be impoosible!)

[ChowChi-Ching]

Here he is cropped a bit. He is probably a bit out of focus because he was bouncing around like a little psycho! LOL Plus, my lighting wasn't great. I think I will set up my lighting kit and try to get a better, brighter picture of him "flying".

[srobb]

Really nice, Chow. This is an adorable shot. The cropped image works much better, I think. Trying to catch him at different angles would be interesting.

[masdog]

Great action capture, Chow. Not to be the only one to disagree with everyone else, but I like the loose crop. It adds perspective to the shot and it implies motion as if the kitten is flying forward and trying to put his paws down to land.

[LeeIs]

ahahhahha. nice capture chow!
All fours off the ground and the look down is priceless!

[ChowChi-Ching]

Thank you!! I like both the cropped and the uncropped. I am anxious to see if I can get a reshot of him from a different angle and with better lighting. He is on restriction right now because he just got fixed but as soon as he is better we will have a re shoot! Thanks for all the comments!!

[dbutler]

Too cute!! I like the uncropped version for the same reason as Sean, though I agree that a different background (and shallower DOF) would have worked far better here. Can't wait to see more of bounder!