Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
I was a bit disappointed that I didn't have anything to put as a specific subject, but thought the sky looked cool so I posted this anyway. I seemed to get quite a bit of feedback on Flickr for this, does it work without foreground interest?
That sky is gorgeous! Love the clouds, and love the reflections. I think something in the FG like a small boat would add a little to the image but I don't think it's needed. I like that the horizon is not centered as well.
"I thought that because fewer wolves meant more deer, that no wolves would mean hunters' paradise. But after seeing the green fire die, I sensed that neither the wolf nor the mountain agreed with such a view."
Aldo Leopold
Yes it would be a more interesting photo with a foreground element but hey, I'd have shot a sky like that too. I actually prefer golden sunsets to red ones and that's as pretty a one as I've seen.
I'd be tempted to clone a canoe in there if I knew how.
As jetrim pointed out -- it's in there, just really small. The magnitude of the water and that beautiful sky in stark contrast to that tiny little "boat" (or whatever it is) is most interesting. Personally, I prefer the lack of some focal point in the foreground in this particular shot.
________________________
Paula
Your editing is welcomed. A picture is worth...
All can look. Few will see. Less will know.
The Truth can be anything it will. I just want to know Truth.