Photo Critique Forum

Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
Featured Photo
Photo by hminx

Photo by hminx
Featured Photo Archive >>
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or off-topic will be removed.
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Senior Member polarbeardiggers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    winnipeg,manitoba,canada
    Posts
    660

    black and white version

    i think the black and white is much more meaning full than the colorized version.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails black and white version-dsc02189.ab.jpg  

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Lawrenceburg, IN USA
    Posts
    147

    Re: black and white version

    Seems I always prefer older building in B & W. Sometimes I will add sepia tone to it.
    Photo does it for me.

  3. #3
    Senior Shooter Greg McCary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Rome Ga.
    Posts
    10,550

    Re: black and white version

    I think that the composition is good but I feel that the building just isn't old and rustic enough. Removing the welcome mat would help some. I like the B&W conversion though.
    Greg
    I am like Barney Fife, I have a gun but Andy makes me keep the bullet in my pocket..

    Sony a99/a7R

  4. #4
    mod squad gahspidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    N.Y. U.S.A.
    Posts
    8,368

    Re: black and white version

    I like the subject and the look of the image but would want to crop out the sliver of sky at the top even at the expense of cutting off more door. the image looks a little soft to me though.
    please do not edit and repost my photos


    gary


  5. #5
    Senior Member polarbeardiggers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    winnipeg,manitoba,canada
    Posts
    660

    Re: black and white version

    this is a heritage house placed in the park built in the 1800's the natural colors are more black and yellowish, with a few twentish add ons,thats why i picked this part of the house,curious on what way you say soft? could you explain so i can compensate next time ,thanks for all your views.

  6. #6
    project forum co-moderator Frog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    wa state
    Posts
    11,195

    Re: black and white version

    Just seems like it needs something to draw the eye as the areas of the composition are so alike that nothing holds my eye. A broom in the corner, a vase in the window, something like that.
    Love your avatar, btw.
    Keep Shooting!

    CHECK OUT THE PHOTO PROJECT FORUM
    http://forums.photographyreview.com/...splay.php?f=34

    Please refrain from editing my photos without asking.

  7. #7
    Senior Member polarbeardiggers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    winnipeg,manitoba,canada
    Posts
    660

    Re: black and white version

    thanks for you comments frog,i understand now,your right the whole picture itself is too plain without a eye catching subject,except for the mat,but even that isn't strong enough,i'm thinking lets say a pair of muddy boots sitting outside the door would of told a completely different story and would be perfect for composition aspect? i'll definetly take that into consideration next time,any other hints would be welcomed, perhaps what item placed in this photo would make it perfect?,.

  8. #8
    mod squad gahspidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    N.Y. U.S.A.
    Posts
    8,368

    Re: black and white version

    Quote Originally Posted by polarbeardiggers
    this is a heritage house placed in the park built in the 1800's the natural colors are more black and yellowish, with a few twentish add ons,thats why i picked this part of the house,curious on what way you say soft? could you explain so i can compensate next time ,thanks for all your views.
    By soft, I mean not sharp. I tried applying a smart sharpen filter in PS and it helped the "screen" appearance of sharpness. It does look like your focal point was the mat and so the elements of the photo nearer to you appear a bit "soft" I think it would look fine in print as far as that aspect is concerned.
    frogs point about there being something more to lock onto as a subject is good advice and your suggestion of a pair of old boots is a perfect example. i personally like the subject enough to have it work for me as it is, but I only find the composition to be a bit awkward.
    the b&w works fine here, but bringing back a touch of the muted colors may work well, as I'm sure the colors had something to do with attracting you to take this shot in the first place.
    please do not edit and repost my photos


    gary


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •