birds of pray

[skinnymachink]

For me, #2 is the most interesting.

The blur of the background caused by the camera pan is nice, but I would have liked to see the owl sharper.

Tough to be more constructive without the vitals (ISO, SS, and f/stop).

Hey here is the meta data from the shots
1: f 5.6 , 1/500ss iso 400
2: f 13 , 1/640ss iso 400
3 f 11 , 1/500ss iso 400
4 f 9 , 1/320ss iso 1000

Cheers skinny.

[AgingEyes]

Hey here is the meta data from the shots
1: f 5.6 , 1/500ss iso 400
2: f 13 , 1/640ss iso 400
3 f 11 , 1/500ss iso 400
4 f 9 , 1/320ss iso 1000

Cheers skinny.

You needed faster shutter speeds. Except the first one, you should have opened up the apertures more or bumped up the ISO.

The first shot has the wing clipped and the bird blurred. The second one also the bird could be sharper and you need more room on the right. The third one would be better if there were more room all around. The forth one, I agree with Gary, is the most interesting one, only that it's no longer a bird photo.