Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
B&W for me, but I like both - nice shots, Is it me or is the tilt an optical illusion, not sure. I like how the downward slope leans into the corner of the picture taking your eye to the right and then bounces back off the hills in the foreground to the left and up to the clouds above the tree.
Nice shot.
"I hope we will never see the day when photo shops sell little schema grills to clamp onto our viewfinders; and the Golden Rule will never be found etched on our ground glass."from The mind's eye by Henri Cartier-Bresson
My Web Site: www.readingr.com DSLR
Canon 5D; EF100-400 F4.5-5.6L IS USM; EF24-70 F2.8L USM 50mm F1.8 II; EF 100 F2.8 Macro Digital
Canon Powershot Pro 1; Canon Ixus 100
Thanks for the feedback. I think the tilt is more optical illusion than anything. I was keying off the valley floor there in the middle. Those bright horizontal lines are water and I'm pretty sure they're level.
Black and white for me..or maybe some variation thereof. I think it's too bad the housing is in the center though it's not completely unattractive. I think that's one reason it works better in b&w, they don't stand out as much. From looking at the tree it looks almost a bit oversharpened to my eyes. Nice composition btw, good eye.