Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
To me, those eye lashes really conflict with the 'outdoor' look. - Terry
-----------------
I am no better than you. I critique to teach myself to see.
-----------------
Feel free to edit my photos or do anything else that will help me learn.
-----------------
Sony/Minolta - way more gear than talent.
The lashes add, IMO. The very first thought I had when I saw this image was "Federico Erra" (never a bad sign). He often places heavily made-up models in incongruously bucolic/natural settings, always to good effect.
The heavier lashes were due in part to a slightly more formal shoot we were doing. This pose was just an afterthought idea we came up with so if you have the time, take the shots. This is another snap from the shoot.
Aha. Context is everything! I like the second shot, too. But the first is just fantastic - one to be proud of. There are probably things you could do in PP to add to the inherent drama, but I'm not sure what they'd be just yet.
Great stuff.
Last edited by draymorton; 07-21-2010 at 10:49 AM.
The only nit I would have would be, that some people like the stray hair cleaned up in PP, but I think that in this setting it is not out of contex. She is a beautiful model, and both shots do her justice, but I like the first slightly more.
Bill,
Feel Free TO EDIT My Photos, But Please Tell Me Why
I have gone over to the dark side, no more film.
Canon T2i, 18-135 IS
Digital Point&Shot - Canon Powershot A470