Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
The first one is pretty interesting arrangement of detail and color. The sky looks a little teal though, and the overall color balance seems a bit off. The out of focus sticks in the foreground of this image really make the shot interesting! Without them, its a plain old regular snapshot, but with them in there it really creates a sense of the perspective and the environment, with pleasant looking, soft natural hues.
Second one is good and sharp, but I dont think the subject matter is very interesting, same with the third but the thirds color balance is very strange to me.
I find the 2nd the most interesting. The last one's colors certainly don't make a neutral impression, seem to work for me (Easter colors ).
Nice work. I like your unedited shots a lot better than the manipulated ones Don. Just the way I see it.
G
Photography Software and Post Processing Forum Moderator. Visit here!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Feel free to edit and repost my photos as part of your critique.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------