A few important questions. Was it a public event? Was everyone aware by sign or otherwise that it benefitted the Arthritis Foundation? Were these basically group photos of more than one child at a time or did you center in very closely on a single individual?Originally Posted by masdog
The television station would likely have gone with these photos without releases given the nature of the event. The law revolves around reasonable expectations. At a public event there is no reasonable expectation of privacy and given the nature of this particular event there was a reasonable expectation that photos would be taken and used in a news or public relations context related to the Arthritis Foundation. This is also not a model situation either.
Ronnoco



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote