Unless you shoot a lot of telephoto, like birds and wildlife - then the 14-54 or 12-60 are nearly worthless and the 70-300 is worth it's weight in gold...the equally priced 14-54 is a very nice lens, but different shooting styles will dictate which is a better choice.Originally Posted by Atomic2
To be honest, the 70-300 would be worth more to me than the 14-54. i've found the 40-150 to be way too short for me, and because of that I've only used it a handful of times. A longer lens like the 70-300 or the bigma would get a lot of use in my stable.
I shoot 90% 50mm f/2 macro, 9% 14-54, and 1% 40-150. If the 40-150 were the bigma or 70-300, it might get around 30 or 40%.
Of course, I have my sights on the 50-200 SWD and the 1.4x teleconverter![]()