"Do you not think it would be an irrational thing for God to expect faith from any of us without providing us good reason to believe?"

I know that this question was not asked of me, but since it was asked in a public forum, and I am interested, I am going to take a stab at it.

Your question is a little wordy, so help to me understand it better I am going to try to condense it. Let me know if I have altered the meaning of your question by rewording it:

"Is it irritational for God to expect us to have faith without giving reasons for that faith?"

If God were to choose to play by the rules of humans, then by our most commonly accepted definitions, yes, that would be irrational. But, completely allowable, as by most people's definitions God is all-powerful, and perfectly capable of doing what it wants, including being irrational.

So if the question behind your question is "Does God have to provide proof?" The answer is no. God is not required to do anything. However, you are perfectly free to choose to believe in a God that provides proof, if you want.

How'd I do?