Nikon Camera Equipment Forum

Discuss Nikon digital cameras, Nikon film cameras, Nikkor lenses, Nikon camera accessories, etc. - Your Nikon cameras forum moderator is Franglais.
Nikon Review Index >>
Nikon Digital SLR Reviews >>
Nikon Nikkor Zoom Lens Reviews >>
Nikon Nikkor Prime Lens Reviews >>
Nikon Camera News, Pro Reviews & Articles >>
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Vr?

  1. #1
    Pulitzer hunter Stupendous Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Peoria, IL
    Posts
    34

    Vr?

    Well, I *almost* bit the bullet...(almost...because I am on a waiting list). The boss gave me the go-ahead to buy the 18-200mm VR lens for my D50. I have the 18-55 kit lens now, as well as the 55-200mm. From my "amateur" perspective, both of these are very fine lenses and have produced well - I especially like the closeups I got with the 55-200 lens.

    However, my biggest complaint was that I most often needed a bit more reach than the 18-55 would give me, and I underestimated the inconvenience of swapping lenses. So, after a lot of internet searching and reading numerous reviews...(but mostly it was the okay from my wife) I decided to go for the 18-200mm VR. (Or rather, put my name on the list at the local camera shop.) You all still have a few days to talk me out of it if I am making a mistake!!!

    Tim
    Whoever said a photograph is worth a thousand words has never heard me !%$&%$@!# at my pictures!

  2. #2
    Be serious Franglais's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Paris, France
    Posts
    3,367

    Stick with it

    Quote Originally Posted by Stupendous Man
    Well, I *almost* bit the bullet...(almost...because I am on a waiting list). The boss gave me the go-ahead to buy the 18-200mm VR lens for my D50. I have the 18-55 kit lens now, as well as the 55-200mm. From my "amateur" perspective, both of these are very fine lenses and have produced well - I especially like the closeups I got with the 55-200 lens.

    However, my biggest complaint was that I most often needed a bit more reach than the 18-55 would give me, and I underestimated the inconvenience of swapping lenses. So, after a lot of internet searching and reading numerous reviews...(but mostly it was the okay from my wife) I decided to go for the 18-200mm VR. (Or rather, put my name on the list at the local camera shop.) You all still have a few days to talk me out of it if I am making a mistake!!!

    Tim
    I have the 18-200 VR. It sits on my D200 most of the time. I just decided to use it for a landscape shoot at the end of the week. It doesn't have quite the same resolution as the 18-70 which is itself a bit behind the 28-70 f2.8 but it's close. Two years ago I would have used my Hasselblad to do this shoot but now I get better results from the D200.

    In other words - it is at least as good as your 18-55 and 55-200, your D50 doesn't really have the resolution to do it justice, the VR feature is very useful for interiors and if you just use one lens then you will avoid getting dust on the sensor.

    Your biggest challenge is getting hold of one. I reserved one at my local camera shop but after waiting six months I finally tracked one down at another shop.

    Charles

  3. #3
    Too square to be hip. almo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Sweet home Ala... Florida
    Posts
    4,749

    Re: Vr?

    How goes the fight against the fiendish Mom-Lady?
    John Cowan
    Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut.
    ~Ernest Hemingway~

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •