Boy do I feel stupid! I haven't worried about genetics in 9 years, so I should have checked my figures before putting my foot in my mouth
Correct me if I am wrong , but a NL X LL produces 50%LL, 50% NL(carring the recessive gene)
You take the N and L and match them up to the L and L giving you 4 matches of NL,NL,LL,LL
It's starting to come back to me..... shall we play with Leucistic recessive for green eyes crossed with green eyed recessive for leucism ....hahahaha
BTW... SW, what do you do for a living that you know genetics so well. Most people don't have a clue, and you obviously know what your talking about quite well.
CAMERA BIRD NERD #1
BIRD NERD O'CANON
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both" - Benjamin Franklin
So.......Let me get this straight........If you cross an alligator that is normal with a recessive leucistis gene with a leucistic gator you would, in a perfect world, produce half leucistic offspring and half normal with the recessive leucistic gene. so the only way to guarantee all leucistic offspring would be to cross two leucistic gators and correct me if I'm wrong but isn't this not even a guarantee....................(My head's starting to hurt)
Correct me if I am wrong , but a NL X LL produces 50%LL, 50% NL(carring the recessive gene)
Yes, you got it.
Originally Posted by paulnj
It's starting to come back to me..... shall we play with Leucistic recessive for green eyes crossed with green eyed recessive for leucism ....hahahaha
Please not, once you have multiple genes involved it gets very complicated.
Originally Posted by paulnj
BTW... SW, what do you do for a living that you know genetics so well. Most people don't have a clue, and you obviously know what your talking about quite well.
I'm an IT Systems Analyst (and wannabe sports photographer) but I did an Environmental Biology degree before dropping out and walking into an IT job.