Here's an example with a Sigma 10-20mm lens all the way out at 10mm. I couldn't back up any farther or I'd go off a cliff, so I put the lighthouse at the top of the frame which kept the camera as close to level (vertically level) as it could be. With a longer lens (16mm, 20mm, etc), the camera would have been aimed up higher (less vertically level) so you'd see more of the "falling over backwards" effect.Originally Posted by tjr51comcast
There's plenty of stuff that can be cropped off the bottom (and the sides to keep the same ratio). Because of this, I didn't care about the shadow at the bottom of the frame or the part of the building just visible on the right. I know it's not a great shot - just trying to illustrate a point and it took a long time to get to this spot...
Nothing done to correct any distortion to it in Photoshop, but you can see it's already fairly close. I'm not a Photoshop expert, but have always preferred to start with a file as close to the end result I want as possible.