I am a bit frustrated. But first the history.
I started with an Minolta XGA, then quickly upgraded to an X700, and purchased a Quantaray 7550 with a fill flash to go along with it.
I liked the results, but keeping everything set properly was a pain. I moved up a to Nikon, and used the same flash. All film cameras until now.
I now have a Canon XT, and since the old Quantaray won't work with it, I just acquired a new 430EX, and a Sigma 17-70, 2.8 lens replace the standard 28-55. It's an ok flash, but unlike my old flash, when I tilt the head 45 degrees, the lower third of the picture is dimmer than the rest.
I reckon that has to do with not having the fill flash, but then again, most flashes don't have that middle flash in there anyway. The only way I have been able to eliminate this, is by pointing the flash straight up and bouncing the light off of the ceiling and not the wall. Please remember, most of my indoor flash shots are of family with normal height ceilings.
Question: Am I doing something wrong, not angling something properly, or not setting something correctly? I am no idiot and have never had this problem in my 20 plus years of hobby photography. This flash seems like a really cool tool, but it frustrates me when the light balance is so far off.
Question; Is the lense I am using wrong for this purpose? I appreciate how wide it can go, and took a real nice family shot, but I had to heavily use Photoshop to lighten the lower third.
Question: If not, is there an attachment that will split the light, so the lower third will be equally lighted?
Question: What is the point of being able to tilt the head at 45, if the lower third will be dimmer than the rest? Might as well always have it straight up to get the proper balance.
Your input would be really appreciated.