So, your camera actually DOES shoot backwards, eh?

Interesting concept. I don't think I've ever seen that kind of camera. Hope you didn't think I was talking down to you in my other post. It's just that I wasn't sure what you were describing with the order of the numbers. As you probably know, many cameras (including digital SLRs) "count" backwards but record the image numbers forward.

Anyway, now that everyone's thouroughly confused, I'm glad that you can see a connection between your bracketing and the results on the prints. That's the important thing...

Quote Originally Posted by kkraczek
Thanks Steve, I'm still not sure what happened, but I guess it doesn't matter in the end, since I can tell by looking which ones are over/underexposed anyway! BTW, when I said that my camera "counts backwards", I was referring to the fact that it automatically unwinds the entire roll into the camera, and as each shot is taken, it winds back into the film canister. That way the shots are protected in the event that the camera back opens. Therefore, my shots are returned in "reverse order". #24 is the first picture I took, and #1 is the last. I hope this makes sense... thanks for your confirmation that I'm not crazy!