I wanted to ask a few questions in regard to the experiences of others who send out their 120 or 220 rolls for developing. I also have been considering buying a camera that will shoot 6 X 6 but right now I am not so sure about it.
In the past I have enjoyed using the Rollei TLR my father left me and another I bought before I went digital. I sold them when I bought my 1D digital. Even though I bought the E0S-3 (which I am still evaluating) I am considering buying a Med Format body as well. So as I am looking at Med Format cameras, I decided SLR is the best way to go at this time, and that I probably need to explore it as inexpensively as possible. While I am aware that there are many great Med Format camera's out there, I have concluded that for now, Bronica is probably my most economical choice. If I get the real bug, I can always move to a Hassey or Mamyia later and make sure I purchase a model that a digital back might be available for as well. My other option is to just shelf things for a bit, and then later go for an H1, 1Ds3, or Z when the prices come down, but then I will be getting away from film at that point.
Now that we are past that, I have a few questions for those in the know.....
This applies to both color and black and white...
1. How available is 120 and 220 film?
2. How available is 6x6 film if I decide to shoot that instead?
3. Are there many labs in the states that will just develop my negatives? Please respond to both sizes of negatives.
4. What is your avg cost to get your 6X6 and 2 1/4 negative developed?
I have a lot of learning and thinking before I continue in this direction.
I thought about processing my own Black and White negatives. That would only mean I would have to buy chemicals because I have the tanks and reels for 35mm and 2 1/4 somewhere. At least I can do those sizes, but I have not 6X6 tank or reel, but I do imagine its the same negative development process. I have never done color developing of negatives so I have no idea how difficult or expensive it would be. Maybe some of you can clue me in?
Although I have an Omega C-700 enlarger that allow me to print black and white in 35mm and 120, I do not think that is my best route to take. I also have investigated Color Enlarger's, but all that stuff takes up space, and having to print in that style means a dedicated space for a darkroom, some equipment, as well as storing all the materials and chemicals necessary for it. Even though lots of great Color enlargers are going very cheap, I do not think its the best choice for me.
I really like to do a good comparison here, and it will probably save a lot of time for me and others.
After a lot of thinking, it appears that going with developed negatives, and sticking to scanning my own to get the working file size I desire, is the most cost effective way. Of course I can always send a finished image to a professional printer and that saves me in that area as well.
I still own a dedicated 35 mm film slide scanner. I have narrowed down my choices for scanning Med Format and that will most likely be an Epson flat bed such as a 4990 if I can get and afford one. I am not sold yet on the newer Epson LED but that may be the way I have to go. Most likely the Epson 750 is the best choice if I cannot get a good used 4990. I think even a 4870 would do, and I am open to suggestions there.
While I know its probably not popular to make this statement, now I am remembering why I decided to go digital...(ducking).
Most of this depends on how affordable it is to deal with the negatives and processing. So before I buy a camera body and lenses, I need to know the pro's and con's of the other side.
Thanks in advance,
Jason