Digital SLR Cameras Forum

Digital SLRs Forum Discuss digital SLRs, lenses, RAW conversion, or anything else related to digital SLRs. You may also want to see the Nikon, Canon, and Sony camera forums.
Digital Camera Pro Reviews >>
Read and Write Digital SLR Reviews >>
Digital SLR Buyer's Guide >>
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Pixel Wars

Threaded View

carney2 Pixel Wars 11-25-2004, 12:15 PM
SmartWombat Re: Pixel Wars 11-25-2004, 02:54 PM
Franglais You pay your money & you take... 11-25-2004, 03:00 PM
another view Re: Pixel Wars 11-25-2004, 07:09 PM
Zman The Factor Bites 11-26-2004, 07:33 AM
Michael Fanelli Re: The Factor Bites 11-27-2004, 12:05 PM
Zman "Get a Grip" 11-29-2004, 12:02 PM
Michael Fanelli Re: "Get a Grip" 11-30-2004, 10:46 AM
Zman Nice reply Mike 12-01-2004, 08:52 AM
drg Re: Pixel Wars 12-01-2004, 11:58 AM
darkman Re: Pixel Wars 12-01-2004, 01:21 PM
  1. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    St. Paul, MN, USA
    Posts
    7

    "Get a Grip"

    Wow Mike, that was harsh.

    I want clarify a few things for you.

    #1 -- I have a grip.
    #2 -- I don't need to take a deep breath.

    I am not some newbie that you are communicating with and I understand the situation very fully, quite clearly as a matter of fact.

    We are not comparing medium/large format to anything either. And yes I believe owners of Hassleblad equipment would be upset if they woke up one day to find there pride and joy lenses to be minimized due to a new format introduced by the company.

    The plain and simple truth is that the 35mm OEM's are rushing new technology out as fast as they can produce it to gain and or keep market share. The initial sales pitch was that your CURRENT 35mm lenses would be fully compatible with the new DSLR's. Well that was only kind of true. Yes, they still mount and produce photos, but not with the same characteristics that they were originally produced for. My 17-35 is still a 17-35 and is still a great lens, you are correct there. But the effectiveness is minimized with Digital and the real value of the lens is greatly reduced. It effectively is a 26-53mm lens now. There is a major differance in the 9mm that I have lost.

    What the OEM's are in the process of doing is creating a entirely new format, they are doing this slowly but surely. If I do purchase a 12-24 it can ONLY be used on my DSLR. Thus there really is a compatibility issue, and it is costly. I really need to decide if I want to stay with 2 formats or bite the bullit and go one way or the other. No free lunch.

    The only problem is that I really like the ease of use with digital. Very, very few individuals actually calculate the true costs of converting to digital and it is not as simple as you make it sound...not even close. I have spent $1000 on a digital body that would cost $350 if it were film, then add another grand for the 12-24. How many rolls of Provia 100 can you buy for $2000, something like 400 at my local store.

    Film is free right, wrong again, I own $500 worth of CF Cards. Don't forget the computer, printer, software, bla-bla.....

    I am not bashing Digital either, it is definitely the way of the future and pretty fun to play with I must say. But at this point there are significant issues that need to be dealt with.

    Maybe you should deal with yours.....

    Z
    Last edited by Zman; 11-29-2004 at 03:49 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. hot pixels
    By yaronsh in forum Photo Printers, Drives, Computers & Other Hardware
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-12-2004, 11:15 AM
  2. I'd like y'all to meet...
    By Kokopeli in forum ViewFinder
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 04-21-2004, 08:46 AM
  3. Macro wars
    By genious_gr in forum ViewFinder
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 04-18-2004, 06:46 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •