Quote Originally Posted by Anbesol
no, you are again putting words and context into something it isn't. Please stop making assumptions about my intentions.
IMO, your intentions were not that clear until your post on 3:24am, which I didn't have a chance to read until until my last post was posted.

No, I had no plan to put words in your mouth. Perhaps some miscommunication and misunderstanding happened along the way. After reading your 3:24am post, I think it would have been better if you had written this in your first post:

[snip]Heck, I doubt any body here would see the difference at 800 or 1600 either, I couldn't. Sadly this sort of hair splitting overhyping aspect in photo-consumer culture is all too common, I just think that the consumers need to be more conscientious of the dynamics of imaging technology, not so myopic.
If you did, my guess is nobody would have come out and stated why good high ISO performance is a good thing to have, which you already knew and agreed.