Digital SLR Cameras Forum

Digital SLRs Forum Discuss digital SLRs, lenses, RAW conversion, or anything else related to digital SLRs. You may also want to see the Nikon, Canon, and Sony camera forums.
Digital Camera Pro Reviews >>
Read and Write Digital SLR Reviews >>
Digital SLR Buyer's Guide >>
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    wannabe
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    157

    Bang for buck and the Canon Rebate

    Here is what I am looking into doing.

    All prices are from B&H

    EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro 239.95
    28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Image Stabilizer USM 419.95
    EOS Digital Rebel XT w/Sandisk 1GB CF 869.95
    Sub total 1529.85

    Rebate

    EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro 30.00
    28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Image Stabilizer USM 150.00
    EOS Digital Rebel XT w/Sandisk 1GB CF 225.00
    Sub Total 405.00

    Grand total 1124.00

    Im thinking this is about as good as I could do with a couple of good all-around lenses.

    The only addition I will need to make down the road will be a Speedlite and the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 zoom I want for sports photography.

    Any thoughts?
    My name is Scott, and I take pictures.

    Canon Rebel XT
    EF L 70-200 f/2.8
    Speedlite 580 EX
    SanDisk Ultra IIs

  2. #2
    Sitting in a Leaky Dingy Michael Fanelli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Perryville, MD
    Posts
    926

    Re: Bang for buck and the Canon Rebate

    Quote Originally Posted by hesaias
    Here is what I am looking into doing.

    All prices are from B&H

    EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro 239.95
    28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Image Stabilizer USM 419.95
    EOS Digital Rebel XT w/Sandisk 1GB CF 869.95
    Sub total 1529.85

    Im thinking this is about as good as I could do with a couple of good all-around lenses.

    The only addition I will need to make down the road will be a Speedlite and the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 zoom I want for sports photography.

    Any thoughts?
    Get a longer macro lens, most photographers prefer them. A good choice would be between 90mm and 120mm. The longer lens gives you more room to work. I have a Tamron 90mm macro that I really like. FWIW, remember that the "magnification factor" doesn't actually make the lens appear any longer, it just chops off the edges.

    The 28-135 is a great lens. I have one and use it as my default choice.

    Sandisk is very good, the majority of my CF cards are Sandisk. I'd avoid Lexar but anything else should be fine.
    "Every great decision creates ripples--like a huge boulder dropped in a lake. The ripples merge and rebound off the banks in unforseeable ways.

  3. #3
    Erstwhile Vagabond armed with camera Lionheart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,110

    Re: Bang for buck and the Canon Rebate

    Quote Originally Posted by hesaias
    Here is what I am looking into doing.

    All prices are from B&H

    EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro 239.95
    28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Image Stabilizer USM 419.95
    EOS Digital Rebel XT w/Sandisk 1GB CF 869.95
    Sub total 1529.85

    Rebate

    EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro 30.00
    28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Image Stabilizer USM 150.00
    EOS Digital Rebel XT w/Sandisk 1GB CF 225.00
    Sub Total 405.00

    Grand total 1124.00

    Im thinking this is about as good as I could do with a couple of good all-around lenses.

    The only addition I will need to make down the road will be a Speedlite and the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 zoom I want for sports photography.

    Any thoughts?
    I think it's a good start, but I agree with Michael on the 50mm compact macro. I rarely use the 50 macro for actual macro work (I use the EF 100mm f2.8 USM macro 99% of the time with the MR-14EX for macro work), but I do pack the 50 macro just in case I happen to have need of a small light true macro lens (the 100mm is twice the size of the 50, and takes up too much space in my travel pack). The 28-135 is a great lens for the price and will take you far, but sooner or later, you'll be craving a 24-70 f2,8 zoom from either Canon or Sigma. The IS on the 28-135 works great, but I gave mine away after awhile-just didn't have the edge sharpness and speed of the 24/28-70mm f2.8L zoom.
    Perhaps a wide angle prime (say 17 to 20mm range) instead of the 50mm to counter the cropping effect of the 1.6x sensor on the XT would be a better addition to the set.
    Just my two cents of course.
    Seek the Son and the shadows fall behind you.

    slowly inching to 2000

    Mac's Rule, Windblows drools
    Friends don't let Friends use WindBlows XPee
    <img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/schrackman/clover.jpg">Lionheart O'Canon Feel Free to Help

  4. #4
    Learning more with every "click" mjs1973's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Mineral Point, WI, USA
    Posts
    7,561

    Re: Bang for buck and the Canon Rebate

    I think you have the start of a very nice kit here! Better double check your rebates tho. The tripple rebate for the 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Image Stabilizer USM is $45. I think you looked at the rebate for the EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM. It's still a pretty good deal if you can take advantage of the rebates, I wish I could...
    Mike

    My website
    Twitter
    Blog


    "I thought that because fewer wolves meant more deer, that no wolves would mean hunters' paradise. But after seeing the green fire die, I sensed that neither the wolf nor the mountain agreed with such a view."
    Aldo Leopold

  5. #5
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    McCordsville, IN
    Posts
    4,755

    Re: Bang for buck and the Canon Rebate

    Yup, looks ok, although since I know you like to shoot sports I think I'd have to say at least a 20D.
    You'd be much happier I think.
    JS

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •