I think I know what I should get, but I would really appreciate any input as I am pretty new to photography and SLR's.
I'm a fine arts painting and printmaking major in my senior year. I've been using a little Nikon Coolpix L6, and it has served me well for the last few years. It still works great, but I've outgrown what it's capable of. I need a camera to use both for photographing my work to submit for juried shows, as well as for shooting pics for future projects. The submissions for shows will primarily be on CD or occasionally printed out around 8x10. Pictures for future works will most commonly be 8x10 but could range anywhere from 5x5 to 20x20 or so. I will probably only be using this thing every couple weeks, but obviously the picture quality is going to matter quite a bit when I do. Regardless of what camera I end up buying, I know I am going to need to study and practice before I get the results that I want. I don't mind that a bit. In fact, I'm planning on taking a photography course next spring.
Originally I was going to get something like a Canon SX10 IS, an Olympus SP-565UZ or the Nikon Coolpix P90. The first two are both 10 megapixels, 20x zoom and seem fairly well rounded. The Nikon is the same but has 12 megapixels and 24x zoom. A viewfinder is an absolute must have. I just don't do well taking pics based off an LCD display.
After quite a bit of urging from my friends, I started looking at entry level DSLRs. I've done a pretty good bit of research and have narrowed it down to either a Canon Rebel XT (8 megapixels) or XTi (10 megapixels) body. I found a couple used ones for about $300 and $350 respectively. They both come with a 90 day warranty. My mom in law has a couple EF-S lenses (35mm-80mm and 80mm-200mm) I can borrow until I decide what I need/want. Her lenses are the main reason I ruled out the Nikon D40, D40x, and Olympus E-420 or E-520. But I have to say I like the idea of the IS system being in the camera body on the E-520. Also, since I do occasionally crop a picture down to get at a relatively small area of it and then blow it back up quite a bit, I am concerned that the D40's 6 megapixels might not be enough.
One hesitation on a DSLR, especially a used one, is that I have uncommonly bad luck with electronics. Extended warranties and service plans have saved me so many times. Are used/manufacter refurbs/dealer refurbs too risky? The only used ones I would consider would come from Adorama, B&H or some well known place like that. Are the Mack warranities from places like Adorama or B&H?
So before I take the plunge and buy something, I would really welcome any input or thoughts you all might have. Do I really need an SLR or would a more advanced P&S get the job done? Lastly, I really don't want to spend more than about $400-$450; obviously if I can get away with less that would be great.
Thanks!
(This was posted previously in the Help Files thread by mistake. How do I delete the post over there?)