Digital Cameras Forum

Digital Cameras Forum Discuss compact digital cameras or ask general digital photography questions - what camera to buy, memory cards, digital camera accessories, etc. You may also want to look at the Digital SLR forum, or the Camera Manufacturer forums.
Digital Camera Pro Reviews >>
Read and Write Digital Camera Reviews >>
Digital Camera Buyers Guide >>
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Hybrid View

perry46033 Panasonic Lumix DMC FZ8 12-13-2007, 07:34 AM
mwfanelli2 Re: Panasonic Lumix DMC FZ8 12-15-2007, 07:56 AM
Photo-John Re: Panasonic Lumix DMC FZ8 12-16-2007, 08:38 PM
perry46033 Re: Panasonic Lumix DMC FZ8 12-17-2007, 09:46 AM
mwfanelli2 Re: Panasonic Lumix DMC FZ8 12-17-2007, 12:32 PM
  1. #1
    Captain of the Ship Photo-John's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
    Posts
    15,422

    Re: Panasonic Lumix DMC FZ8

    Is the shake warning the only problem you're having? Because if that's the case then we can probably help you improve your technique. How old is the camera you have now? Cameras introduced in the last year have much better high ISO performance than older digital cameras. So a new camera will help you with motion blur and freezing action because you'll be able to get better image quality at higher ISO settings. And Michael's reply is right on target and pretty much addresses everything you mentioned. I am just wondering if there's more you're looking for. The more specific you are the more we can help.
    Photo-John

    Your reviews are the foundation of this site - Write A Review!

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    9

    Re: Panasonic Lumix DMC FZ8

    Let me try to be more specific...I take pictures of my daughter's gymnastics meets. Flashes are prohibited, but I don't really get close enough for it to work anyway. The good side is that the nicest pictures come from her poses anyway, so not as much need to "stop action". Lighting is kind of hit or miss.
    The camera I use right now is the Canon A540. I set it to 800 ISO and use aperature priority. It would work if I didn't also try to zoom. But since I'm not usually all that close maybe 30 ft away from her if I can get close, I can't help but try to make her fill the frame. Otherwise I get a lovely picture of everything else.

    My old camera a Sony Cybershot (2.1MP, but can't remember the model) worked surprisingly well. The only reason I replaced it was the battery was shot and I didn't want to spend $50 on a new one when there were other issues. From the time I would press the button until the camera got around to recording the picture, the moment was over. I got good at anticipating her routine to get the "pretty shot", but I missed more than I hit. Quite honestly, the quality of the picture was not that bad for only being 2.1MP. Certainly I would have liked more, but the shots were pretty clear.

    Thanks for all the input.

  3. #3
    Formerly Michael Fanelli, mwfanelli, mfa mwfanelli2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Perryville, MD
    Posts
    648

    Re: Panasonic Lumix DMC FZ8

    Quote Originally Posted by perry46033
    Let me try to be more specific...I take pictures of my daughter's gymnastics meets. Flashes are prohibited, but I don't really get close enough for it to work anyway. The good side is that the nicest pictures come from her poses anyway, so not as much need to "stop action". Lighting is kind of hit or miss.
    The camera I use right now is the Canon A540. I set it to 800 ISO and use aperature priority. It would work if I didn't also try to zoom. But since I'm not usually all that close maybe 30 ft away from her if I can get close, I can't help but try to make her fill the frame. Otherwise I get a lovely picture of everything else.

    My old camera a Sony Cybershot (2.1MP, but can't remember the model) worked surprisingly well. The only reason I replaced it was the battery was shot and I didn't want to spend $50 on a new one when there were other issues. From the time I would press the button until the camera got around to recording the picture, the moment was over. I got good at anticipating her routine to get the "pretty shot", but I missed more than I hit. Quite honestly, the quality of the picture was not that bad for only being 2.1MP. Certainly I would have liked more, but the shots were pretty clear.

    Thanks for all the input.
    OK, that may be the problem. You need shutter priority, not aperture priority. Set the shutter speed to 1/250 or faster. The aperture will adjust itself as necessary. If there is an auto-ISO, try using that as well. Otherwise, set the camera to ISO 800. See what you get.

    Your Sony may have been setting this stuff for you already, probably in a program mode. I'm not familiar with that model.
    “Men never do evil so cheerfully and completely as when they do so from religious conviction.” — Blaise Pascal

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •