Quote Originally Posted by mwfanelli2 View Post
Nice idea but I am under the impression that the very small sensor is P&S size: 1/1.7 just like my Canon S95. If that is the case, is the lack of pixel size worth it to get interchangeable lenses? Or maybe just stick with a P&S super zoom...
You didn't read my article, did you?

The new "CX" format is quite a bit larger than the sensor in the S95. It has about twice the area, in fact. However, it's about half the size of a Four Thirds sensor. So it should be considerably better than any point-and-shoot camera but it will have a hard time measuring up to the Micro Four Thirds cameras. On the other hand, Nikon has had the best DSLR image quality for the past few years and the Nikon 1 system has a new Expeed 3 processing, so it's possible they've worked some magic and it wil surprise us all.