I'm new to this forum, so hi all.
Have only recently (14 months ago) entered into digital photography.
Based on a rec. I got the digital rebel, even though I have been a Nikon fan since the 70's.
So like most, I can't get enough and am in the process of upgrading. I still shoot a decent amount of film but am going to jump to much more didgital.
So...20D or 30D, that is the question.
Recent reviews that I've read don't praise the 30D as that much of an advancement over the 20D. The general consensus seems to be that it is not worth the extra price as the 20D was when it was first released. Now in my case it's about a $300. difference. I shoot portrait, sports/action, candid photojournalism, aerial and product.
In your opinion, is it worth or not worth the extra cash and why? I am very curious to hear what you have to say.
Thanks in advance for you opinion and input.