Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
Looks like you have a new toy filter effect here Don . I'd say a smart blur one (been there, done that). I also use it but just below the threshold of noticeability, say 5 %. The top one has some interesting angles the way everyone's looking this way and that. The bottom is just a big cluster ..but challenges one to figure it all out.
G
Photography Software and Post Processing Forum Moderator. Visit here!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Feel free to edit and repost my photos as part of your critique.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I really like the first one where the interaction between the two offsets the other two.
The other I find intriguing as to what they are all queuing for, especially the boy in white who seems to have just come out.
Roger R.
"I hope we will never see the day when photo shops sell little schema grills to clamp onto our viewfinders; and the Golden Rule will never be found etched on our ground glass."from The mind's eye by Henri Cartier-Bresson
My Web Site: www.readingr.com DSLR
Canon 5D; EF100-400 F4.5-5.6L IS USM; EF24-70 F2.8L USM 50mm F1.8 II; EF 100 F2.8 Macro Digital
Canon Powershot Pro 1; Canon Ixus 100
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
. I'd say a smart blur one (been there, done that). I also use it but just below the threshold of noticeability, say 5 %. The top one has some interesting angles the way everyone's looking this way and that. The bottom is just a big cluster ..but challenges one to figure it all out.
