Photo Critique Forum

Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
Featured Photo
Photo by hminx

Photo by hminx
Featured Photo Archive >>
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or off-topic will be removed.
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Portraits

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Chelsea, AL USA
    Posts
    35

    Portraits

    I posted these in another forum and got no feedback. I've never done portraits before so I practiced with my kids. I'd like some feedback so I could improve these shots.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Portraits-img_4641w.jpg   Portraits-img_4655w.jpg  
    Canon EOS 30D
    Canon 70-200mm f4.0 L
    Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 DG HSM

  2. #2
    GB1
    GB1 is offline
    Moderator GB1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    San Diego CA
    Posts
    9,960

    Re: Portraits

    Well, I'm no portraiture expert but I can offer some humble advice based on how the shots grab me.

    Of the two I prefer the composition on the color one. It's always a little dangerous to cut them off inside the frame like you did in the B&W image (and partially in the color). If you have to cut off an arm/leg/whatever, never do it at the joint btw. I think the color host has a small violet cast. In general if you have to lean towards a color instead of being neutral always lean towards a warm cast. I like the triangle you arranged them in on the top image. The bottom shot is missing that. The tree branches make a nice natural frame but they might be a tad too close to the tall fellow's head. The tonal values in the B&W are good, imo. Too bad it is clipped, I would like to see more of the image.

    In all, not a bad set of shots. There's room for improvement but there's definitely some good things happening here.

    -GB
    Photography Software and Post Processing Forum Moderator. Visit here!

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Feel free to edit and repost my photos as part of your critique.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    My Site

  3. #3
    Senior Member AgingEyes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    3,103

    Re: Portraits

    The colors in your color photo are off. I don't know what they look like on your monitor. On mine, they don't look good. A color cast like GB1 has pointed out. Regardless of the composition, it pays to pay attention to the skin tone.

    Warning: I know little about portrait. But a lot of folks who use the same camera as mine shoot a lot of wedding photos. They like to talk about skin tone, among other things.

  4. #4
    Senior Member readingr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Basingstoke UK
    Posts
    4,564

    Re: Portraits

    Jad,

    What settings did you have the camera on to take these?

    Whenever I take portraits I use spot metering on the skin where it is brightest to get the correct settings and set the AWB to neutral so that I can then correct it in post processing. I shoot in RAW so it gives me plenty of latitude in correcting problems with exposure.

    I think the skin is blown out hence the loss of tone in that area.

    I am not the best at portraits, where is Alison when you need portrait advice.

    Roger
    "I hope we will never see the day when photo shops sell little schema grills to clamp onto our viewfinders; and the Golden Rule will never be found etched on our ground glass." from The mind's eye by Henri Cartier-Bresson

    My Web Site: www.readingr.com

    DSLR
    Canon 5D; EF100-400 F4.5-5.6L IS USM; EF24-70 F2.8L USM 50mm F1.8 II; EF 100 F2.8 Macro
    Digital
    Canon Powershot Pro 1; Canon Ixus 100


  5. #5
    Senior Member freygr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Portland, OR, USA
    Posts
    2,522

    Re: Portraits

    Well I have to say the color photo looks on the over exposed side, the skin tones washed out, and it the better composed photo in my opinion. The B&W is the better exposed but it needs more of the subject in the frame.
    GRF

    Panorama Madness:

    Nikon D800, 50mm F1.4D AF, 16-35mm, 28-200mm & 70-300mm

  6. #6
    project forum co-moderator Frog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    wa state
    Posts
    11,195

    Re: Portraits

    No portrait expert here, either, but agree with everything above and would add that I think the depth of field should be shallower.
    Keep Shooting!

    CHECK OUT THE PHOTO PROJECT FORUM
    http://forums.photographyreview.com/...splay.php?f=34

    Please refrain from editing my photos without asking.

  7. #7
    Grumpy Old Man Overbeyond's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Ireland (Now in London)
    Posts
    2,372

    Re: Portraits

    There are also some positives here. The general posing is very good and natural in my opinion and in the first you have used the tree and branches to perfection. The background of greenery would be better had it been blurred out somewhat (larger lens aperture/smaller f stop).
    In the second you have again set the kids up very well for another nice natural pose and I like in particular the body language of the younger boy as he leans against the post.
    So for you first portrait attempts these are good and will sit very nicely in the family album for your kids to show to their kids in years to come.
    My colleagues here have pointed out some negatives and their advice should be helpful.
    http://www.overbeyond.com


    I have a total lack of respect for anything connected with society, except that which makes the roads safer, the beer stronger, the food cheaper, and the old men and old women warmer in the winter and happier in the summer. Brendan Behan

  8. #8
    Senior Member AgingEyes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    3,103

    Re: Portraits

    I'd like to add that although the colors of the first photo are off, it is fixable.

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Chelsea, AL USA
    Posts
    35

    Re: Portraits

    I hate to admit this, but I set the camera to auto and snapped these as fast as I could. I don't normally do that, but the tempature was in the thirties and my kids were freezing. They were throwing their jackets off long enough for me to take one or two pictures. I wanted to try a few different settings, but they weren't going to cooperate long enough. And to top it off, I forgot the new diffuser that I'd bought at home. So I agree that they're over exposed. I was really interested in hearing what people had to say about the position that they were in, the back ground and the framing of the shots.

    Thanks for all of the feedback. When the weather warms up, I'll make them go again when I can spend more time.
    Canon EOS 30D
    Canon 70-200mm f4.0 L
    Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 DG HSM

  10. #10
    MB1
    MB1 is offline
    The Skeptical Photographer MB1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Washington, DC and Clermont, FL
    Posts
    3,144

    Re: Portraits

    Of the 2 I like the color shot the best. On my monitor here at work (which tends to show things dark) the skin tones look fine.

    I think both images would benefit from a tighter crop from the sides making the kids the only focus of the shot instead of "kids in a park".

    A really tight crop might even save the BW image-you almost have a natural frame above and next to them with the legs and crosspiece of the shelter. Crop just outside that and I think it would look pretty good.

    Remember when you are shooting portraits to fill the frame with your subject unless there is some reason to include lots of background (for instance if you were taking portraits inside your home or their rooms and wanted to show their natural habitat as well as them).
    No, I DON'T need that.

  11. #11
    LRPS Alison's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,773

    Re: Portraits

    Quote Originally Posted by readingr

    I am not the best at portraits, where is Alison when you need portrait advice.

    Roger
    LOL am I THAT famous?

    Sorry I totally missed this post!
    I was going to run in here saying, "Did someone mention portraits?!" haha
    I still say I am no expert but others beg to differ. I do like to help people if I can though

    As for colours etc its all subjective, and it's hard to know how experienced you are with a dslr and photoshop, but you can follow a few simple rules when taking portraits.

    The rule of thirds and think triangles or diamonds, (this you nailed without realising probably in the first). This also helps you to see faces in large groups take a look at the old school class photo. Everyone is staggered.

    I like both portraits but would have pereferred them to be off centre.
    Not so much the first due to the tree forming a frame over the subjects. I really like that and the bg with some great depth of field is nice too.
    Some things work well centered, like standing all 3 in an archway. It's nice when you frame your subjects.
    I love that wooden porch type construction. I would have probably stood all 3 over to the right pillar and shot the whole building.

    I think the colour version could do with some yellow being added to the colour balance.

    It's a shame they weren't all wearing the same colour because the human eye is attracted to the lightest part of the image. This being the young man's t'shirt on the left.
    I know it's not always possible to get everyone colour co-ordinated so in this case I may have hidden the young man's bright t-shirt by the other 2 subjects sitting in front of him in both images.
    Of course this is always easier said than done when under pressure to take pictures quickly. I always forget alot of things when under pressure especially at weddings!

    Please try to get off auto if you can. When I used to use auto, the focus was very rarely where I wanted it.
    Alot of portrait photographers use AV but I don't like the slow shutter this gives me at times. I use manual alot of the time now and P when I use my flash.

    Do you know how to meter in-camera so that you don't get blown out highlights on faces?

    Apologies if I have repeated anything. (I haven't read all the posts tut tut).

  12. #12
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Chelsea, AL USA
    Posts
    35

    Re: Portraits

    Thanks for the additonal comments. This was my first attempt at doing portraits and I was not sure on positioning and framing of the subjects. As I said, I don't normally use auto, but my kids were freezing their butts off. I don't have any experience metering and that was something that I wanted to try, but they weren't going to cooperate (and I didn't blame them because I was cold as well).
    Canon EOS 30D
    Canon 70-200mm f4.0 L
    Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 DG HSM

  13. #13
    LRPS Alison's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,773

    Re: Portraits

    You are very welcome.
    Metering is pretty easy.
    Here is what your in camera meter looks like




    For perfect exposure the needle should be in the middle. It's best to slightly underexpose by 1 or 2 stops to help prevent blow outs on the face. That was a tip I learned from a member on here.
    Set the exposure by adjusting the shutter speed or the aperture.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •