10 Years of PhotographyREVIEW.com!
Camera reviews, digital camera reviews, and photography community

Help Files Camera and Photography Forum

For general camera equipment and photography technique questions. Moderated by another view. Also see the Learn section, Camera Reviews, Photography Lessons, and Glossary of Photo Terms.

Welcome to the PhotographyREVIEW.com forums - the friendliest camera and photography forums on the Internet!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest. After registering, you will be able to start and reply to forum threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), upload photos, post camera reviews, create your own profile page, and lots more. Registration is fast, simple and free so join the PhotographyREVIEWcom community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

Go Back   Photography & Digital Camera Forums > General Photography > Help Files
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Moderators Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Help Files Post your photo equipment and technique questions here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-09-2009, 10:19 PM   #1
Skekses
Junior Member

user gallery  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1
Capturing moving pictures without blur

Hi. This is my first post and I should warn you I am in no way a professional photographer. But I thought I got a great camera particularly for my own art references due to the fact that I'm an Illustrator and Graphic Designer. I also have a nephew on the way and wanted to get the best pics possible that I could afford.

We all know babies don't stand still for pictures. So when I started taking pictures with my Sony Cybershot W-170 I realized that not only did my subject have to be perfectly still, but I did as well. I can't just take a picture of someone slightly moving without them coming out blurry.

I'm wondering if anyone is familiar with this camera and can possibly tell me if there's a way to prevent this from happening. I turned up the ISO but it ends up looking "fuzzy". Am I screwed and bought a camera that is only idea for still shots?
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2009, 06:52 AM   #2
cm_mtb
Member

user gallery  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 218
Re: Capturing moving pictures without blur

I'm guessing you are trying to get shots of the baby indoors. No point and shoot camera is truly capable for low light work. Your best bet would be to move outside; the best light would be during a cloudy day, or in patchy shade. If you are stuck inside, do what you can to get the baby close to windows. The flash is also your friend. It will help "freeze" the action, although the harsh lighting will likely not be as pleasing as natural light. Good luck!
__________________
"The camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera." - Dorothea Lang

flickr
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 08:58 AM   #3
Photo-John
Captain of the Ship
 
Photo-John's Avatar

user gallery  
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: AltaBird - SLC
Posts: 10,889
Babies Are Tough

Shooting babies indoors with a point-and-shoot is tough. Light is the key. Spontaneous photos of a wiggly baby in a dark room are simply unrealistic. You can use the flash, of course. But flash photos usually look a bit harsh. cm_mtb's suggestion about taking the baby outside is a good one. You can also set up photos next to a big window. Window light is wonderful for portraits.
__________________
Photo-John

Your reviews are the foundation of this site - Write A Review!
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 11:44 AM   #4
freygr
Senior Member
 
freygr's Avatar

user gallery  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Posts: 2,123
Re: Capturing moving pictures without blur

1) Increase the camera's ISO setting.
2) Increase the light, 500 watt work lights work
3) use flash, like Photo-John said "flash photos usually look a bit harsh" you can add a diffuser or use bounce flash
4) spend more $$$ for a DSLR with a FAST $$$ lens - only if your rich
__________________
GRF

Panorama Madness:

Nikon D70, 50mm F1.4D AF, 18-70mm, 28-200mm & 70-300mm
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 09:33 PM   #5
Mr Yuck
AutoX Addict
 
Mr Yuck's Avatar

user gallery  
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 1,388
Send a message via AIM to Mr Yuck Send a message via MSN to Mr Yuck Send a message via Yahoo to Mr Yuck
Re: Capturing moving pictures without blur

Don't totally throw out the idea of flash because of the harsh lighting. Pictures I took of my niece turned out fine with flash....something about perfectly smooth skin.
__________________
<><
Flickr
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asylum Steve
I was going to post that, but thought better of it, because I didn't want her to hunt me down and bludgeon me with a monopod...
--Rebel XTi, Sigma 10-20mm, Canon 50mm f1.8, Canon EF 100-300mm F4.5-5.6
--Powershot A510
Offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:55 AM.


Top Five Budget Digital Camera Gifts
Five Budget Digital Camera Gifts

Feature Articles
&
Pro Reviews:

Camera News:
Photo Newsletter!
Enter e-mail for PhotographyREVIEW newsletter





Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.


 MtbREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com

Copyright ©1996-2008 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda