10 Years of PhotographyREVIEW.com!
Camera reviews, digital camera reviews, and photography community

Film Cameras and Photography Forum

Discuss film photography techniques, including darkroom, film types, film cameras, filters, etc. - forum moderator is Xia-Ke.
Read and Write Film Reviews >>
Read and Write 35mm SLR Reviews >>
Read and Write Rangefinder Camera Reviews >>
Read and Write Medium Format Camera Reviews >>

Welcome to the PhotographyREVIEW.com forums - the friendliest camera and photography forums on the Internet!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest. After registering, you will be able to start and reply to forum threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), upload photos, post camera reviews, create your own profile page, and lots more. Registration is fast, simple and free so join the PhotographyREVIEWcom community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

Go Back   Photography & Digital Camera Forums > Other Photography Forums > Film Photography
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Moderators Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-01-2009, 07:21 PM   #1
Greg McCary
Olympus 4/3rds Moderator
 
Greg McCary's Avatar

user gallery  
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Rome Ga.
Posts: 6,564
Diafine test shot....

This was taken at 1250ISO on TriX 400 and developed 3min in A solution, 3min in B solution, rinsed, fixed and dried. Not bad. I am impressed with the result. I took it with a Leica m6 and a Nokton 40mm SC.

__________________
Greg

Please ask before editing my photos





"If your pictures aren't good enough, you aren't close enough" Robert Capa

Gear
Olympus E3, Zuiko 14-54mm, Zuiko 70-300mm
Panasonic L1, Zuiko 28mm 2.8
Leica M6, Nokton 40mm 1.4
Leica M3, Summicron 5cm collapsible
Canonet QL-17 GIII
Cokin ND grad
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2009, 09:11 PM   #2
photophorous
light wait
 
photophorous's Avatar

user gallery  
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,829
Re: Diafine test shot....

Nice shot, Greg. I just received my second batch of Diafine in preparation for some live music shots in a dark club. The first batch lasted over two years. I didn't use it much, but the last film I developed came out very thin, unusually thin even for Diafine, so I decided to replace it. It's amazing how much range you can pull out of contrasty scenes with this developer and Tri-X. Works great out in the sun, if you can stop down far enough.

Paul
__________________
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 02:51 AM   #3
Greg McCary
Olympus 4/3rds Moderator
 
Greg McCary's Avatar

user gallery  
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Rome Ga.
Posts: 6,564
Re: Diafine test shot....

Quote:
Originally Posted by photophorous
Nice shot, Greg. I just received my second batch of Diafine in preparation for some live music shots in a dark club. The first batch lasted over two years. I didn't use it much, but the last film I developed came out very thin, unusually thin even for Diafine, so I decided to replace it. It's amazing how much range you can pull out of contrasty scenes with this developer and Tri-X. Works great out in the sun, if you can stop down far enough.

Paul

Can you use it for any ISO's? Can I develop film that has been shot at 400iso?
__________________
Greg

Please ask before editing my photos





"If your pictures aren't good enough, you aren't close enough" Robert Capa

Gear
Olympus E3, Zuiko 14-54mm, Zuiko 70-300mm
Panasonic L1, Zuiko 28mm 2.8
Leica M6, Nokton 40mm 1.4
Leica M3, Summicron 5cm collapsible
Canonet QL-17 GIII
Cokin ND grad
Offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 04:40 PM   #4
photophorous
light wait
 
photophorous's Avatar

user gallery  
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,829
Re: Diafine test shot....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg McCary
Can you use it for any ISO's? Can I develop film that has been shot at 400iso?

I think it is pretty flexible, but I'm not sure how well it would work at 400 ISO. I've never tried that. Based on things I remember reading in the past, I think you'd get very flat results with some blown highlights. Probably usable but not pretty. I think you'd get better results with a normal developer.

From my experience with TriX & Diafine, the most important thing is that you shoot high contrast scenes because it will lower the contrast of anything you shoot. I tried using it in soft evening light and the results were way too flat. Shooting Neopan 1600 or pushing TriX in a normal developer works much better for soft low light situations.

Here's an example of how well it handles contrast...sunlit snow and shadows. This is straight from my scanner, no editing. 1250 ISO, stopped down with a high shutter speed.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:05 AM.



Feature Articles
&
Pro Reviews:

Camera News:
2009 PMA Tradeshow Coverage
2009 PMA Coverage
March 3-5
Photo Newsletter!
Enter e-mail for PhotographyREVIEW newsletter





Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.


 MtbREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com

Copyright ©1996-2008 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda