Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
I'm not sure it's sharp enough...I can only see the hairs on her nose...
Something about her eyes looks a little cloudy. I think if you cleaned up the pupil beyond the catch lights that may help.
mostly Nikon gear
Feel free to edit my images for critique, just let me know what you did.
I have never been a fan of the cropped chin, so i def have a bias against this. There are some times when i feel it does work, but it seems to be very few for me. Everything else looks fine.
I know I'm' the new guy but I like this shot much better. I agree with the Steampunk, not even as a professionaI, I'm just an ameture but I'm also a consumer and still I've never been a fan of the cropped chin look. A persons' face is a complete package and if you want to sell me on this person then I need to see their face as a whole.
Crops are fine if you're selling eyeliner or mascera or other makeup where the focus is the product not the person. If I'm going to see Lauren, I want to see her like in pic #2. While it's not as tight and not as sharp, it has more character by leaps and bounds.
But thats just my opinion from another perspective.
Either way, both are beautiful shots, I love how the soft light and background contrasts the richness of the colors (ie the eyes and hair) it's beautiful.
Bert
Feel free to edit and repost my photos for critique if you feel so inclined! :idea:
Canon 40D
Canon 7D
Canon EOS Rebel 2000
Canon Powershot SX120
-----------------------------------
EF 50mm f/1.8 II
EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS
EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS
EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS
EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS
Thanks Maplestreet. This shot is just as sharp as the first, but I applied a "soft focus" in post processing and a few other changes (like the window frames painted into the catchlights). I really wish I had gotten the head placement of the first shot in the wider angle of the second. Just a very small tilt/rotation of the head (less than 1/2") completely changed the lighting from closed loop to side light.
Thanks Maplestreet. This shot is just as sharp as the first, but I applied a "soft focus" in post processing and a few other changes (like the window frames painted into the catchlights). I really wish I had gotten the head placement of the first shot in the wider angle of the second. Just a very small tilt/rotation of the head (less than 1/2") completely changed the lighting from closed loop to side light.
I like everything about the 2nd shot better than the first including expression and light. - Steampunk
Super portraits and the tight crop is fine, the eyes make the shot. I found the fence (I think it's a fence) in the first shot distracting. Great work.
:thumbsup: Shootme...
Please don't edit and re-post or use my images (not that you'd want to anyway...). without my written permission. Thank you
Super portraits and the tight crop is fine, the eyes make the shot. I found the fence (I think it's a fence) in the first shot distracting. Great work.
I think its a door in the bg, and i agree it could be cropped away at least partially.
Peter, your avatar is crazy cool! lol makes me smile...