Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
starri......that second shot is the one that appeals to me. I think that one fits the title best. The tones are pretty much on, and the angles of the shadows really make the shot, IMO. John
starri......that second shot is the one that appeals to me. I think that one fits the title best. The tones are pretty much on, and the angles of the shadows really make the shot, IMO. John
The first photo only illustrates a place, the second one is a good artistic image that makes the viewer think a little bit (as in, "I'll have to try something like that." ). The last image is better than the first but not as thought provoking as the second.
The second, the b/w, image is the one that is the most eye grabbing for me. The white light in the right area of the pic does detract from the weight of the piece and moves the viewers focus away from what I believe is the intended image.
I would like to see several more angles of this structure for the interplay of the shape and light, particularly the strong central directional light in these photographs. The way the shadows radiate out from the 'tristand' is a strong element to exploit should you work with this location again.
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by swmdrayfan
). The last image is better than the first but not as thought provoking as the second.
