the steampunk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gahspidy

Wow, and holy Crap! Did you have help with spell check or are you just that good:D

Hey, can I use your description in my resume?

Thanks!

---

:lol: In American I think you would say "Fill your boots" Hope that's not an insult!

Yes did check the spelling got two characters right, the first and the last :lol:

As OldClicker said check the copyright first, but Disney won a case where defended itself from a copyright suit claiming the word was used prior to the film and the manuscript of the suing team. That does not mean they haven't copyrighted the word since.

Roger R.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OldClicker

You might want to check the copywtite on that first. :) TF

---

Ha, good point, but I'm really just kidding about using it. However, now that you mention copyright a lawsuit from Disney could only help me I'm feelin. . .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by readingr

:lol: In American I think you would say "Fill your boots" Hope that's not an insult!

Yes did check the spelling got two characters right, the first and the last :lol:

Roger R.

---

No insult at all! Actually I think thats more a mid west thang. We in the East especially in or near the city usually just say Awesome, or I'm hearing a lot from the younger ones "Sweet!".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Frog

I want one of those for my Nikon. Actually was thinking yesterday that I wish they had one with which I could change aperture and shutter speed.

As for the party, does it matter if the model is ugly?

---

Had a Chinon CP7 in the 80s that did that in the camera. Could set it to shoot at anything from every second to many hours. Loved the feature but Chinon wasn't exactly a reliabe camera though it was just fine when it worked.

It annoys me to no end that Gahs has a better face for photgraphing than I. Oh well. I will soldier on.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gahspidy

I'm pretty sure nikon has one as well. These little gadgets, although expensive are very convenient and can allow for alot of experimenting, not just self portraits but time lapse photography, getting in on shots with family and have multiple pics taken, etc.
worth a look into

---

Nikon doesn't but Opteka does http://opteka.com/optekatimerremotec...lrcameras.aspx

Well this thread kind of wandered!

Gary,

I really like this one but after looking at it a few times I think the crop is a little crowded. I also don't see the point of binoculars in a black room. You have so many cool spots with industrialized decay that you could shoot this at. Maybe the True Evil 2 photo spoiled me a bit, the outfit and look you've totally nailed but I think this guy needs a little more story in his background.

Now what's all this talk about a Hell Party? :devil:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Frog

Nikon doesn't but Opteka does http://opteka.com/optekatimerremotec...lrcameras.aspx

---

Hey Frog, this is a lot cheaper than the Canon and looks like it has a version for many different camera manufacturers and models. Looks like it does the same thing as my Canon programmable remote.
One thing also i like better about this is the use of AAA batteries. I believe my Remote uses some odd disc type cell. Which reminds me, I have to order a spare . . .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CLKunst

Well this thread kind of wandered!

Gary,

I really like this one but after looking at it a few times I think the crop is a little crowded. I also don't see the point of binoculars in a black room. You have so many cool spots with industrialized decay that you could shoot this at. Maybe the True Evil 2 photo spoiled me a bit, the outfit and look you've totally nailed but I think this guy needs a little more story in his background.

Now what's all this talk about a Hell Party? :devil:

---

thanks for the ideas Cindy. Actually, I am hoping to reshoot this one again sometime in the near future. I have a seriously cool steampunk Ring on the way and i really wanted it included in the shot. :)
I'll keep in mind a location setting. this was pretty much experimenting but the result was well and so I held on to this one.
These and more are actually in a portfolio competition I am involved in and the link is belwo in my sig.
The party in hell thing is coming from an inside joke so to speak which started from a thread in which the photographer had mentioned he googled photoshopping and found it to be borderline unethical. So, those of us that do photoshop have been joking that were going to hell, and thus the party in hell.
You can come down if you like. . .were really not that bad.

Again, great photo !

Love the texture of the fabrics, the details in the skin and the crazy " just got through a tornado" hair style , I guess that' why you're wearing googles ?

Quote:

---

The party in hell thing is coming from an inside joke so to speak which started from a thread in which the photographer had mentioned he googled photoshopping and found it to be borderline unethical. So, those of us that do photoshop have been joking that were going to hell, and thus the party in hell.
You can come down if you like. . .were really not that bad.

---

Hmph! Well if that's true then Lucas, Spielberg, Cameron, and Jackson probably aren't real film makers either. I'm in. :thumbsup:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CLKunst

Hmph! Well if that's true then Lucas, Spielberg, Cameron, and Jackson probably aren't real film makers either. I'm in. :thumbsup:

---

We a pure evil! Come on Gary say it proudly! WE ARE PURE EVIL ha!

I see you uploaded the SteamPunk and PureEvil to the self-portrait portfolio :thumbsup: ....as I said before kick @ss pics Gary.