Fine Streak Of Stars

[metoliusdmm]

THis photo was taken last May. It is an eight hour exposure, done with a Canon FTB ql, and a Canon 28mm lens F-stop 4. Please comment on this. I would appreciate it big time.

Devin

[XVampire]

That is an awesome pic, the trees accentuate it nicely. Is the far left streak a planet? It sure looks bright.

[metoliusdmm]

Thanks, Im not sure if it is a planet or not, it sure seems like it could be. I wish everyone could see the full size print. It has all kinds of color in it, blue greens, red, yellow, and orange, it looks a lot better than it does on the computer
But thanks for the comment

Devin

[Hindey]

Looks stunning to me, brilliant photograph. I wish I could see the actual version too!

[Young Shooter]

I dont know i have never taken one of these b/4 isnt 8 hours a little long, dont u need like 2 or 3 and it looks a little washed out to me

[Chunk]

I dont know i have never taken one of these b/4 isnt 8 hours a little long, dont u need like 2 or 3 and it looks a little washed out to me

The angle in this diagram is about 3 hours. In a three hour exposure no star could leave a longer arc than what could be inscribed within this angle. There would also be a lot fewer streaks because in 3 hours only about 1/8 of the sky passes in front of your camera while in an 8 hour period about 1/3 of the sky does.

[Chunk]

THis photo was taken last May. It is an eight hour exposure, done with a Canon FTB ql, and a Canon 28mm lens F-stop 4. Please comment on this. I would appreciate it big time.

Devin

This is a nice star trail shot, Devin. You might try boosting the saturation in the original scan to try and get it to look like the original print. I agree that the colored trails are wonderous when you can view them.

[metoliusdmm]

The angle in this diagram is about 3 hours. In a three hour exposure no star could leave a longer arc than what could be inscribed within this angle. There would also be a lot fewer streaks because in 3 hours only about 1/8 of the sky passes in front of your camera while in an 8 hour period about 1/3 of the sky does.

Why would you send a reply like this, im sorry but it really bothers me that you have to go about the math crap to contridict my photo, sorry but it really was an eight hour exposure. I don't care what you have diagramed. Thats the deal.

Devin

[Lara]

Correct me if I'm wrong Chunk, but metoliusdmm, I don't think Chunk was contradicting your photo. It looks to me that he was trying to explain to young shooter that to get the arc shown in your photo, it would take MORE than 3 hours.
Chunks response to you is in post #7.

[Chunk]

Why would you send a reply like this, im sorry but it really bothers me that you have to go about the math crap to contridict my photo, sorry but it really was an eight hour exposure. I don't care what you have diagramed. Thats the deal.

Devin

I'm sorry that I wasn't clearer, Devin. I like your shot and know that it was it is as you said and wasn't trying to contradict you. I was trying to answer Young Shooter's question about why 3 hours isn't enough to get a shot like yours - that's why I made sure I replied to his post with his question quoted. I considered PMing the anser to him but thought that others might also wonder the same thing since he had voiced the question.

Once again, I apologize.

[Clicker]

... thought that others might also wonder the same thing since he had voiced the question.

Devin, I love star trail pictures like this !

Also, Thanks Chunk,

I found the information you posted to be very helpful and informative, as I would love to capture something like this shot, but **now** i know that i'd have to do it with a fresh battery... although my camera battery says it lasts only 5 hours.. hm.

[smallfrypics.com]

Why would you send a reply like this, im sorry but it really bothers me that you have to go about the math crap to contridict my photo, sorry but it really was an eight hour exposure. I don't care what you have diagramed. Thats the deal.

Devin

Helloooooo............He was trying to explain why you had done an 8 hr. exposure to answer young shooters question. If you don't like the critique that you get, then don't put you stuff here!

[metoliusdmm]

Hey sorry guys, what i wrote probably wasn't the best thing to write back to someone, i apologize for the crap. Sorry i guess i just got frustrated that i thought that he was attempting to tell me that the picture was a fake, do you see where i am coming from. Sorry, i will try not to blow up like that again. actually i won't blow up like that again, Chuck, sorry man, hopefully you will still look at my photos as i post them.

Devin

[Chunk]

Hey sorry guys, what i wrote probably wasn't the best thing to write back to someone, i apologize for the crap. Sorry i guess i just got frustrated that i thought that he was attempting to tell me that the picture was a fake, do you see where i am coming from. Sorry, i will try not to blow up like that again. actually i won't blow up like that again, Chuck, sorry man, hopefully you will still look at my photos as i post them.

Devin

I don't think you need to apologize, I wasn't clear enough either. Keep posting please, cause I like what I see when you do.

[Chunk]

Devin, I love star trail pictures like this !

Also, Thanks Chunk,

I found the information you posted to be very helpful and informative, as I would love to capture something like this shot, but **now** i know that i'd have to do it with a fresh battery... although my camera battery says it lasts only 5 hours.. hm.

5 hours will make some good trails. Find a good foreground for an interesting silouhette.

[metoliusdmm]

I don't think you need to apologize, I wasn't clear enough either. Keep posting please, cause I like what I see when you do.

Cool, Thanks Man!

Devin