Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
"The aim of art is to represent not the outward appearance of things, but their inward significance." Aristotle
"What the mass media offers is not popular art, but entertainment which is intended to be consumed like food, forgotten, and replaced by a new dish." W. H. Auden
Not a view I'd like to see without a long telephoto !
Shame about that prominent plant just right of centre leading up the the eye.
The other plants and twig I can live with, but that one is obtrusive to me.
But no way would I go and 'garden' it with my swiss army knife with that alligator about !
"The aim of art is to represent not the outward appearance of things, but their inward significance." Aristotle
"What the mass media offers is not popular art, but entertainment which is intended to be consumed like food, forgotten, and replaced by a new dish." W. H. Auden
Yes and no, because the head-on view is FAR better than this slight angle.
To be honest, I prefer the original composition far more.
The plant is now not in front of the eye, but it's still a little distracting.
Do you have one from a step further left?
Maybe it'd better with the plant to the right, curving towards the alligator.
Or just edit the original and tone down the colour/brightness.
I think it caught the flash more than some of the other vegetaton.
I find nature getting in the way is terribly hard to spot in the viewfinder.
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
