Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
If it is not OK to repost your image, say so and I will remove it.
Terry
-----------------
I am no better than you. I critique to teach myself to see.
-----------------
Feel free to edit my photos or do anything else that will help me learn.
-----------------
Sony/Minolta - way more gear than talent.
After thinking about it, it might be either a really close up crop (cant do that for a large print because I was only at 300mm) or the 2nd shot with most of the plants. I never really liked shots with ONLY the wildlife and nothing else. I like character and atmosphere then just a bird sometimes. Even though this picture doesnt have that much to add it's at least something.
I too like #2 of the original crop. But I would add a tad more breathing space on the left side.
I think a 3:2 ratio isn't going to be as strong as a more aggressive 2:1 ratio crop. The implied motion is horizontal and the water above the osprey isn't really contributing to the shot as much as the vegetation.