Re: 2nd part, C & C Welcome
The top looks resonable for printing. I would however clone out the items on the right - switch, pole... before printing. Also add a touch of sharpening using the unsharp mask.
The second one looks a little soft on my monitor but the colours look good. You need to review the original to see if the softness came from the resizing before making a decision on printing.
The other 3 seem to have been taken in very bright light - noon'ish? and have a few areas which are blown out, so personally I would look to see if they can be recovered from the original before printing.
Roger
1 Attachment(s)
Re: 2nd part, C & C Welcome
Re: 2nd part, C & C Welcome
the 4th kind of looks like stars are reflecting in the water. With some treatment, you could make that a lot more convincing.
Re: 2nd part, C & C Welcome
I've found that flowers are tough to get a really spectacular shot, but overall these are very good. The third and fourth are my favorites, # 4 looking like an explosion (what caused that?). The others are OK but don't really have the compositional quality to put them over the top. Also, the lighting might have been a bit too harsh on # 5.
GB
Re: 2nd part, C & C Welcome
I didn't realize that in the 4th one it looked like stars. Now that I look at it again, I see what you mean. Maybe I'll tweak it a little and see what happens. In reality, there are just a lot of specs of dust or debree in the water this flower was in. I liked the flower a lot, so I shot it. The first photo is one that I made look overexposed and saturated on purpose. I liked the way it turned out. :shrugs: Thanks for your input guys.
Jason