PhotographyREVIEW.com Off-Topic Forum

Anything that's not related to photography, except religion and politics*. Discuss Britney Spears, your Kiss records, swing dancing, salsa recipes. The Off-Topic forum is moderated by walterick and adina.
*Religious and political threads will be deleted
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    has-been... another view's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Rockford, IL
    Posts
    7,649

    Katrina, two years later

    I've been hearing a lot about what's happening in New Orleans and the whole area affected by Hurricane Katrina (and Rita, that followed shortly later) as this is the second anniversary of the storm.

    I haven't been to the area since then, but a friend recently returned from a week's work near Gulfport MS and had a lot of stories to tell. Most city blocks have one house standing, but by now many of those houses are repaired. The way I see it, one house per block is probably about 10% of the population that was there two years ago. Will the town survive?

    There have been a lot of conflicting stories about New Orleans. Residents point to areas like the 9th Ward which don't look much different than they did after the waters receeded (as verified by my friend who also visited this area). The government talks about the ship canal walls that have been repaired, the shipping port being open, 80% of the restaurants and an even higher percentage of hotels also being open. I'd say you would need that to get commerce flowing again but then if I were a resident it would be hard to argue with living conditions after two years.

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    McCordsville, IN
    Posts
    4,755

    Re: Katrina, two years later

    LOL, a friend called and said he had a job for me, full time, good pay, one catch... it's in the US murder capitol, NO at the "PT" NO largest paper.... yeah, just where I want to go. The thought of being below sea level in area known for hurricanes doesn't appeal to me, maybe because I am smart enough to realize the dangers of such a settup. There are ways to do it and make it safer, like taking dirt from other places and filling the city in and bringing it above sea level, but thats expensive, so why not just abandon it and let the ocean have it back. It's costing too much money and too many lives to be worth rebuilding, and it's obvious most of the residents don't want to go back anyway, or they would have done so by now.
    Canon 1D
    Canon 1D MK II N
    Canon 70-200mm USM IS f2.8
    Canon 200mm f1.8 USM
    Canon 300mm f2.8 USM IS
    Canon 28-300mm USM IS f3.5-5.6
    Canon 50mm f1.8
    Vivitar 19-35mm f3.5-5.6

  3. #3
    has-been... another view's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Rockford, IL
    Posts
    7,649

    Re: Katrina, two years later

    Quote Originally Posted by JSPhoto
    The thought of being below sea level in area known for hurricanes doesn't appeal to me, maybe because I am smart enough to realize the dangers of such a settup.
    Can't argue with that - how many years before another one blows in? Nobody knows. Chances are that it will happen again but it may not be within our lifetimes. Is that acceptable? I don't think so. A couple (at least) of small midwestern towns have literally moved since the Mississippi River flood of '93. Why can't we do that with New Orleans?

    Well, anyplace other than New Orleans probably could be moved. Buildings, roads and sewers can be built and would probably a smarter long-term investment. But New Orleans is different than any place I've ever been. I think it would be gone forever if it were to be moved. I think it would be a lot like Celebration, FL (that place gave me the creeps).

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    McCordsville, IN
    Posts
    4,755

    Re: Katrina, two years later

    It may sound like I don't care about the history of NO, but I am being realistic, it's just not worth the expense to make the city liveable and safe, from hurricanes other natural disasters, there are faults that could affect any dykes in the area or man made disasters such as terrrorism or the present ongoing murder rate.
    I just can't see wasting the billions of dollars to rebuild the city when kids in our country starve, and there are much more important, and obviously no one there seems to really care as they still cannot get control of the city from the gangs two years later. I say turn it into a huge prison, then if the dykes fail it just lowers the nations inmate population and we wouldn't need to worry how long FEMA takes to respond.....

    JS
    Canon 1D
    Canon 1D MK II N
    Canon 70-200mm USM IS f2.8
    Canon 200mm f1.8 USM
    Canon 300mm f2.8 USM IS
    Canon 28-300mm USM IS f3.5-5.6
    Canon 50mm f1.8
    Vivitar 19-35mm f3.5-5.6

  5. #5
    Film Forum Moderator Xia_Ke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Mainahh
    Posts
    3,353

    Re: Katrina, two years later

    Quote Originally Posted by JSPhoto
    ... we wouldn't need to worry how long FEMA takes to respond.....

    FEMA is a joke. I was looking through the gallery of a photographer named Samuel Portera today who lived in NO during Katrina and has a pretty powerful gallery. Here's one shot of his that sums it up...

    "The Problem"
    Aaron Lehoux * flickr
    Please do not edit my photos, thank you.

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    McCordsville, IN
    Posts
    4,755

    Re: Katrina, two years later

    Is that REALLY the problem? I doubt it. First off most FEMA employees can't afford cars like that unless they are at the very top levels. Second, many FEMA workers are not even paid or paid very little, so most likly this is a volunteers car who just happens to have a very good jib and can afford such luxery.
    I think the person is stupid driving it to NO as it makes them a target for the criminals.
    JS
    Canon 1D
    Canon 1D MK II N
    Canon 70-200mm USM IS f2.8
    Canon 200mm f1.8 USM
    Canon 300mm f2.8 USM IS
    Canon 28-300mm USM IS f3.5-5.6
    Canon 50mm f1.8
    Vivitar 19-35mm f3.5-5.6

  7. #7
    project forum co-moderator Frog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    wa state
    Posts
    11,195

    Re: Katrina, two years later

    I agree with JS. Its a huge waste of our money to even have tried to rebuild a city sitting a bowl surrounded by water. I do understand the sentimental feelings but if New Orleans has a 'spirit', that spirit can live elsewhere.
    Helping the people go live where the same thing might happen any time isn't helping.

    BTW, I saw some statistics on the news and they said that the population is up to 2/3 what it was pre-Katrina.
    Keep Shooting!

    CHECK OUT THE PHOTO PROJECT FORUM
    http://forums.photographyreview.com/...splay.php?f=34

    Please refrain from editing my photos without asking.

  8. #8
    Jedi Master masdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Somewhere north of US 10 and east of Wausau, WI, USA
    Posts
    1,282

    Re: Katrina, two years later

    Quote Originally Posted by Xia_Ke
    FEMA is a joke. I was looking through the gallery of a photographer named Samuel Portera today who lived in NO during Katrina and has a pretty powerful gallery. Here's one shot of his that sums it up...

    "The Problem"
    FEMA is a joke, but Katrina was a comedy of errors that left Murphy rolling around on the floor laughing. The City of New Orleans, the State of Louisiana, and the Federal Government were all caught unprepared, and the least privileged residents of New Orleans were the ones who suffered for it.

    Then again, if you live in an area that could easily be hit by a hurricane each year, you should have a bug-out bag and some supplies just in case you can't get out right away.
    Sean Massey
    Massey Photography

    Canon 20D
    Canon Digital Rebel XT (backup)
    Canon 70-200 f/2.8L
    Canon 50mm f/1.4
    Sigma 28-105 f/2.8-4.0
    Epson Stylus Photo R1800 Printer

    Blog:
    IT 4 Photography


  9. #9
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    McCordsville, IN
    Posts
    4,755

    Re: Katrina, two years later

    The funny thing is just after I wrote that a couple who wound up here in Indy was on the news and said they would never have thought of living anywhere else but NO until they came to Indy temporarily, now they won't go back, even with our huge jump in crime , it's safer than NO before Katrina.... that should explain some things. So maybe making NO the new Alcatraz isn't such a bad idea.... and much cheaper.....

    JS
    Canon 1D
    Canon 1D MK II N
    Canon 70-200mm USM IS f2.8
    Canon 200mm f1.8 USM
    Canon 300mm f2.8 USM IS
    Canon 28-300mm USM IS f3.5-5.6
    Canon 50mm f1.8
    Vivitar 19-35mm f3.5-5.6

  10. #10
    Senior Member mn shutterbug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    SW MN
    Posts
    2,386

    Re: Katrina, two years later

    Quote Originally Posted by JSPhoto
    So maybe making NO the new Alcatraz isn't such a bad idea.... and much cheaper.....

    JS
    And if Alcatraz sinks into the sea, look at the money it would save us tax payers. :thumbsup:

    I just read in a Time magazine that 1/4 of the country's oil comes from the part of Louisiana that is slowly sinking into the sea.
    Mike
    www.specialtyphotoandprinting.com
    Canon 30D X 2, Canon 100-400L, Thrift Fifty, Canon 18-55 IS 3rd generation lens plus 430 EX II flash and Better Beamer. :thumbsup:

  11. #11
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    McCordsville, IN
    Posts
    4,755

    Re: Katrina, two years later

    Quote Originally Posted by mn shutterbug
    And if Alcatraz sinks into the sea, look at the money it would save us tax payers. :thumbsup:

    I just read in a Time magazine that 1/4 of the country's oil comes from the part of Louisiana that is slowly sinking into the sea.

    Well maybe it's a good place for death row and lifers.....


    Hmmm, oil out ground down...any correlation there? It would make sense.

    JS
    Canon 1D
    Canon 1D MK II N
    Canon 70-200mm USM IS f2.8
    Canon 200mm f1.8 USM
    Canon 300mm f2.8 USM IS
    Canon 28-300mm USM IS f3.5-5.6
    Canon 50mm f1.8
    Vivitar 19-35mm f3.5-5.6

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •