I'm learning to use a little fill flash on my (mostly) birds. Is this too much? - TF
-----------------
I am no better than you. I critique to teach myself to see.
-----------------
Feel free to edit my photos or do anything else that will help me learn.
-----------------
Sony/Minolta - way more gear than talent.
I'm learning to use a little fill flash on my (mostly) birds. Is this too much? - TF
The use of flash is very useful in certain occasions (as in this photo). In this case there has been a bit of reflection in the branch and in the eye, easily remedied.
What do you think?
Ciao
Ciao dall'Italia-My latest photos :wink5: : http://forums.photographyreview.com/...d=1#post418901
My gallery on italian forum: :smilewinkgrin: http://www.photo4u.it/album_personal.php?user_id=23886 You can use my photo for correct mistakes
NIKON D300S,NIKKOR 18-200,TAMRON 90 MACRO 1:2,8, SIGMA 120/400 4.5/5.6 - COOLPIX S640-Extension tubes-Flash TUMAX 880+ring macro - N° 3 old KONICA A. T - T3 - DARKROOM for B&W and old CIBACROME
I think the branch looks better, but I think the eye looks dead. - TF
-----------------
I am no better than you. I critique to teach myself to see.
-----------------
Feel free to edit my photos or do anything else that will help me learn.
-----------------
Sony/Minolta - way more gear than talent.
I think the branch looks better, but I think the eye looks dead. - TF
Share your thoughts, perhaps the eye must not touch it. I wanted too
Ciao dall'Italia-My latest photos :wink5: : http://forums.photographyreview.com/...d=1#post418901
My gallery on italian forum: :smilewinkgrin: http://www.photo4u.it/album_personal.php?user_id=23886 You can use my photo for correct mistakes
NIKON D300S,NIKKOR 18-200,TAMRON 90 MACRO 1:2,8, SIGMA 120/400 4.5/5.6 - COOLPIX S640-Extension tubes-Flash TUMAX 880+ring macro - N° 3 old KONICA A. T - T3 - DARKROOM for B&W and old CIBACROME
One area where I really struggle with my photography is with the use of flash. For my tastes of nature photos, if I can tell a flash was uses, it wasn't used properly. That being said, i don't think this it too bad but I can tell a flash was used. I think the really dark BG and the highlight on the branch is what gives it away. The branch in the 2nd image looks better, but I agree with the eye. I wouldn't touch the eye. The catchlight is a nice touch. As far as the flash goes, I would try to balance it better with the ambient light. I don't know what you had it set at but I would go with at least a stop lower than than what you would get with ambient light alone.
"I thought that because fewer wolves meant more deer, that no wolves would mean hunters' paradise. But after seeing the green fire die, I sensed that neither the wolf nor the mountain agreed with such a view."
Aldo Leopold
Hey OC I also have trouble with flash and its outcomes.
As for the pic on display I think that yes its a little to much...The bird is well lighted but what I can see on my screen is that it looks "flat" or plane if youŽll like, it takes away the the deepness of the subject a bit.
DonŽt know if some sort of diffuser might aid in this case.
What I found to work on some occasions is use the fill-in flash to lets say 1/4 - 1/16 and then play with the Exp compensation.
HTH
Canon XSi
Canon EF-S 17-85mm IS USM
Canon EF-S 55-250mm IS
"A true photograph need not be explained, nor can it be contained in words."Ansel Adams
"Photography is more than a medium for factual communication of ideas. It is a creative art."Ansel Adams