Help Files Camera and Photography Forum

For general camera equipment and photography technique questions. Moderated by another view. Also see the Learn section, Camera Reviews, Photography Lessons, and Glossary of Photo Terms.
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    misanthrope
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    315

    Got a new used camera- is it any good?

    I inherited a P&S camera from a relative.
    "You're into taking pictures, right? Here's this old camera I don't use anymore. I got a digital so I don't need this old film thing anyway."
    It's a Ricoh FF-7D. "D" for Date model. 35mm F/3.5 autofocus lens. Built-in flash. Has some modes: panorama, night shot, multiple exposure, TV, continuous shooting and interval. The TV mode, according to the 4 little photocopied pages from the manual, is for "taking pictures from a TV screen." No kidding! The interval mode is for taking picures at set intervals it says. I'm wondering what market segment this camera was aimed at. Your usual compact doesn't do multiple exposures or "interval" photography. It also has what appears to be a mid-roll rewind button on the bottom near the tripod socket. You can't manually deploy the flash, though. I guess you'd have to block the meter with your hand or something to fool it into thinking it's dark.
    So my question: is this a decent little camera or was she unloading her junk onto me? Anyone know of these cameras? I've never shot Ricoh, and their website doesn't even list film cameras. Oh, and the battery was $14. Ouch! Should I dump this thing or what? And where do I get a manual?
    This thing feels solidly built but the romance ends there. Its pretty clunky in the hand and the AF is so slow it's not really worth it. The film wind is as noisy as my old worn-out EOS 650. The controls are less than intuituve, etc... I want to hate it but I was looking for a little snapshot camera to pack around with me. What have I got here?
    "We've all been raised by television to believe that one day we'll all be millionaires and movie gods and rock stars -- but we won't. And we're slowly learning that fact. And we're very, very pissed off."

    -Fight Club, Chuck Palahniuk

  2. #2
    has-been... another view's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Rockford, IL
    Posts
    7,649

    Re: Got a new used camera- is it any good?

    The "TV Mode" makes me wonder, never heard of that! It may not be the greatest camera, but you can't beat the price. This way, you're more likely to take it out in the rain or some place you wouldn't want to bring an expensive camera. Because of this maybe you'll get a great shot that you wouldn't otherwise have.

    Did you Google it to see if you can find some info?

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    326

    Re: Got a new used camera- is it any good?

    Are you sure?
    On a canon, Tv means shutter priority. At least on the T70 it is.

    Well if its a P&S then maybe not....
    P&S generally dont end up being worth much
    If you want film, then SLR or (rarer) rangefinder is the way to go.
    I would even go as far to say that film P&S is starting to go obsolete with the declining price of AE/AF SLR dropping every season. Problem is that along with the price drop, there is also some decline of quality.

    Plus Ricoh isnt one of those well brands that gives a twitch out of anyone.
    Soundds like you dont like it too much too...so...I think you know the answer

  4. #4
    misanthrope
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    315

    Re: Got a new used camera- is it any good?

    AV- you're right- there's a really nasty storm just passing over the west coast and the swells and rainfall are pretty cool. I would rather ruin the free camera than my $300 camera. 400 speed print film and away I go! I searched the 'net first before I posted this question- I got no specific results. Oh well... I'll have to diligently ;) experiment and see how everything works.
    92135011- yeah, that's what it said. Do know the difference also- I shoot an Elan 7N and a 650 for a backup. I too was mystefied by their description of the mode. But hey, if the thing even has variable shutter speeds (assuming that their "TV" mode means that it shoots the fastest shutter speed possible for the given situation) then this might not be so bad a lightbox. I guess I have a few test rolls to shoot. First impressions can be misleading, they say.
    Thanks guys!
    "We've all been raised by television to believe that one day we'll all be millionaires and movie gods and rock stars -- but we won't. And we're slowly learning that fact. And we're very, very pissed off."

    -Fight Club, Chuck Palahniuk

  5. #5
    has-been... another view's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Rockford, IL
    Posts
    7,649

    Re: Got a new used camera- is it any good?

    Quote Originally Posted by Outdoorsman
    assuming that their "TV" mode means that it shoots the fastest shutter speed possible for the given situation
    Might do the opposite, actually. I've never tried it but heard that you need 1/30 or slower or you'll see a line thru it. If you've ever seen someone sitting at a computer on TV, this happens a lot. Same was true for older fluorescent lighting - faster than 1/30 and you might see a flicker inside the tube. Newer fluorescents (last 10 years or so) don't have this issue though. Try it out, see what it does...

  6. #6
    Seasoned Minolta Man Clemmie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Lincolnton, NC, USA
    Posts
    229

    Re: Got a new used camera- is it any good?

    Television Sync Speed? What will we think of next?

    OK - 60 hertz AC power on the set, is gonna give 60 on and 60 off pulses per second. (Likewise 50 and 50 for the 50 hertz standard). So a 1/30 shutter speed is going to catch 2 on's and 2 off's while the shutter is open.

    Given that the picture is 'on' half the time and 'off' half the time, allowance will need to be made for the lighting.

    Then, we'll need to consider what type of shutter we have. A leaf shutter, like on a medium format, will pretty well 'sync up' in real time. Curtain shutters are a bit trickier - effectively a slit moving across the film plane, instead of exposing the frame all at once. Thus we're likely to get a 'banded' picture from the subject, regardless of what speed we're using.

    Are we having fun yet?

  7. #7
    misanthrope
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    315

    Re: Got a new used camera- is it any good?

    I shot a few b&w frames of a NASCAR race a while ago, straight off the TV. I used a fast shutter to stop the action, and none of the frames have a line. I actually expected all of them to be "lined" but they worked out. There was also a shot of Bush giving a speech and it was fine also. I know I used a fater shutter than 1/30, just can't recall the specific value. I have been looking into video cameras for the Peru surf trip in the spring, and I see mode for this on some of the higher end models. This mode is specifically for shooting with computer monitors and TV screens in the shot. Gets rid of the line, they say. I will have to take another look and see what it specifically does to accomplish the line-free footage. The Canon GL-2 camcorder: "Clear Scan: When shooting the display screen of a personal computer or a TV, a noticeable rolling black bar or flickering may appear. This can be eliminated by adjusting the scanning frequency setting on the camcorder."
    But I think you may be right. The 1/30 speed would be just about right for hand-holding the camera (35mm lens). We shall see...
    "We've all been raised by television to believe that one day we'll all be millionaires and movie gods and rock stars -- but we won't. And we're slowly learning that fact. And we're very, very pissed off."

    -Fight Club, Chuck Palahniuk

  8. #8
    Just a Member Chunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Jefferson, WI, USA
    Posts
    3,351

    Refresh Rate

    The need for 1/30 or slower for TV photos is due to the refresh rate and interlaced fields rather than the frequency of the supplied current. http://www.audiovideo101.com/learn/a...dtv/hdtv08.asp
    The first paragraph applies to conventional TV in the US. (NTSC)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II Digital SLR - Press Release
    By Photo-John in forum Camera News & Rumors
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-21-2004, 11:07 AM
  2. Nikon Coolpix 8400 - Press Release
    By Photo-John in forum Camera News & Rumors
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-16-2004, 04:46 PM
  3. Leica Digilux 2 Digital Camera Test
    By Photo-John in forum Camera Test Lab
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-30-2004, 08:20 PM
  4. Press release: Nikon D70 Digital SLR
    By Photo-John in forum Camera News & Rumors
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-07-2004, 07:20 PM
  5. good camera?
    By Jamie87 in forum Help Files
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-25-2004, 04:11 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •