LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
A new consumer protection lawsuit claims Facebook executives such as Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg mislead Congress and the American public, stating that the company removed content that violated its policies. A report on Thursday by Muslim supporters of the civil rights organization said the company routinely allows posts that violate the rules. They said the actions spread anti-Muslim hatred on the platform, leading to real-world harm.
As one example of ทดลองเล่นสล็อต Facebook's failure in this regard, the organization pointed to a list of 26 anti-Muslim hate groups that share with the company, 19 of them still in the network, and many of them have strong names. Clear connotations of anti-Muslims such as "Jihad Watch" and "Understanding Threats".This is not 'Oh, there are two things that are going down,'" Mary Bauer, an advocate for Muslim lawyers, told NPR. But the nonprofit pointed out, Facebook has decided not to remove the content. "The lawsuit asked a judge to order Facebook to stop making false
and misleading statements about its moderation policies and practices. Content and pay for "small" damages.Facebook's Community Standards explicitly prohibit hate speech. "We don't allow hate speech on Facebook and work with experts, nonprofits and other stakeholders on a regular basis to help make sure Facebook is a safe place for everyone. Muslims may be different, "a Facebook spokesperson told Engadget." We have invested in AI technology to eliminate hate speech and we proactively detect 97 percent of what we negative. "
Critics often accuse Facebook of doing too little to prevent hate speech and misinformation from spreading on its platform.In defense, the company is likely to point to the latest tools it recommends to combat the speech. Better hatred, in addition to new policies focused on tighter sanctions on individuals and communities that repeatedly break the rules.
Reply With Quote
