Digital SLR Cameras Forum

Digital SLRs Forum Discuss digital SLRs, lenses, RAW conversion, or anything else related to digital SLRs. You may also want to see the Nikon, Canon, and Sony camera forums.
Digital Camera Pro Reviews >>
Read and Write Digital SLR Reviews >>
Digital SLR Buyer's Guide >>
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Teleconverters

Hybrid View

peted56 Teleconverters 01-28-2005, 06:57 PM
JK_Photo Re: Teleconverters 01-29-2005, 10:44 AM
paulnj Re: Teleconverters 01-29-2005, 10:53 AM
Ryguyinlj Re: Teleconverters 01-29-2005, 05:36 PM
peted56 Re: Teleconverters 01-30-2005, 01:38 AM
paulnj Re: Teleconverters 01-30-2005, 07:09 AM
peted56 Re: Teleconverters 02-03-2005, 05:06 PM
peted56 Re: Teleconverters 02-03-2005, 05:12 PM
peted56 Re: Teleconverters 02-03-2005, 05:14 PM
paulnj Re: Teleconverters 02-04-2005, 07:16 AM
ustein Re: Teleconverters 02-06-2005, 10:40 AM
  1. #1
    Around the Ocean... Ryguyinlj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Orange County / La Jolla CA
    Posts
    149

    Re: Teleconverters

    I was wondering the same thing. I want to get a teleconverter but I can't spend 150+ on one

  2. #2
    Techno Junkie peted56's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Canberra, ACT, Australia
    Posts
    50

    Re: Teleconverters

    Thanks for the info guys, I want to use it on a Sigma 55-200mm, it's an F4-F5.6 so should autofocus in good light at least. I tried a Kenko MC7 with a 18-50mm Sigma DC and of course it was okay but a waste of time. I think that I will just save the extra and look at the Sigma 170-500mm or a fixed 400 or 500 or something like that as I will end up with much better results. If I was doing this to make money I would had a different setup completely but I do this for fun and do not have a very large budget so want to make every dollar count.

    Cheers.

    Pete D.

  3. #3
    nature/wildlife co-moderator paulnj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    hillsborough NJ, USA
    Posts
    9,315

    Re: Teleconverters

    get a fixed 400 F5.6(if you can find one cheap?), the sigma 50-500 , or the tokina 80-400. While I own the 170-500 and got AMAZING detail for the cost, most people Don't . The 50-500 is a much nicer, better built lens.

    Unfortunately, PENTAX MOUNT 3rd party lenses are few and far between compared to nikon and canon mount. It could be a licencing issue or just that the pentax mount is in less of a demand?
    CAMERA BIRD NERD #1




    BIRD NERD O'CANON

    "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both" - Benjamin Franklin

  4. #4
    Techno Junkie peted56's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Canberra, ACT, Australia
    Posts
    50

    Re: Teleconverters

    A friend has the 17-500mm on order, the cost is probably more than I want to spend at the moment. I looked at the 50-500mm and it looks amazing, perhaps the tokina 80-400mm will be more reasonable. Any recomendations on the fixed 400mm?

    Thanks.

    Pete

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Teleconverters
    By peted56 in forum Digital SLRs
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-15-2005, 03:21 AM
  2. Lens adapters, teleconverters, for all in one cameras? (sony f828!)
    By Ultra Magnus in forum Digital Cameras - General
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-15-2004, 07:40 AM
  3. Teleconverters for non "L" lenses?
    By kkraczek in forum Help Files
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-30-2004, 04:52 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •