Digital SLR Cameras Forum

Digital SLRs Forum Discuss digital SLRs, lenses, RAW conversion, or anything else related to digital SLRs. You may also want to see the Nikon, Canon, and Sony camera forums.
Digital Camera Pro Reviews >>
Read and Write Digital SLR Reviews >>
Digital SLR Buyer's Guide >>
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Va
    Posts
    1

    Starting out as a sports photographer

    Hello, I'm new to these forums and am eager to tap into the vast knowledge here. I'm looking to purchase a Canon 20D to use for sports photography, however, is this the right choice? Initially, I'm not planning to make this a full-time job, as I am a student, however, I want a camera that can pictures that could be sold for a small profit. Is the Canon 20D optimal for sports photography? What lense would be optimal for taking pictures of soccer/football/field hockey/lacrosse? My budget is capped at $2000 for the body and the accessories. Additionally, where should I buy the Canon 20D? I found a website that sells just the body for $900 new, however this price is $500 less than anywhere else. Should I be wary of this website (even though it looks legitimate). Here's the link:

    Thanks in advance

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    23

    Re: Starting out as a sports photographer

    Other people on here will probably be able to give you better advice, but thought I might be able to help a little.

    With a $2000 budget...the 20D is probably the best camera for sports you'll be able to get. When I save up enough, that's the camera I'll be getting to photograph wakeboarding.

    As far as lenses, The 20D with the 18-55 lens is around $1500-1600 and so for a sports lens with the left over money, I'd get either the Canon 70-200 F/4L (a little over $500) or the Sigma 70-200 F/2.8 EX (a little over $600 and includes tripod mount). That will put you a little over your $2000 limit, but it would be a pretty good sports setup for the the limited budget.

    I would be leary with a company selling the 20D for that cheap, but look them up at www.resellerratings.com to see what others have to say about them.

    Hope that helps a little

  3. #3
    has-been... another view's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Rockford, IL
    Posts
    7,649

    Re: Starting out as a sports photographer

    Not being a Canon shooter, I can't comment too much on their gear. However, digital camera bodies get updated much faster than the lenses do. What about a used 10D and one of their 80-200 f2.8 lenses? Not being sure of all of the exact advantages and disadvantages between the two bodies, you will want to check that out - but if you're serious, spending money on lenses is usually a good (or better) bet.

    Check out the "shop" link at the top of this page. If you buy thru one of the links then this site gets a few dollars as a referral which always helps! Most people here have had good experiences with B&H, Calumet and Adorama and I agree from my own experiences. If someone is selling it for so much less than everyone else then there's a reason for that. You probably won't get a warranty, accessories, instructions, software, etc - if they send you the camera at all!

  4. #4
    Around the Ocean... Ryguyinlj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Orange County / La Jolla CA
    Posts
    149

    Re: Starting out as a sports photographer

    A 20D is an excellent choice. but it may be more than you need. It can shoot 5 frames per second and can shoot 20+ continuous frames. trust me, it makes it a lot easier when catching fast paced action at times.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Chino Hills, CA
    Posts
    1

    Talking Re: Starting out as a sports photographer

    I just got into sports photography as hobby; my 9 yr old dauthter played soccer and indoor basketball. I started out with 10D and two lenses - 28-135mm IS and 70-300mm IS in early April of this year. You definitely need at least 200mm lens with 1.6x lens cropping factor; you get 320mm with 10D. These two lenses were adequate when you have good lighting; however, they are not fast enough for indoor shooting. I then acquired 1D Mark II, 70-200mm F2.8 L IS, 135mm F2 L and two extenders- 1.4X and 2X. I got the 1D Mark II because I thought I can do better with faster AF body. I finally realized that 10D was more than fast enough for me. The lens is more important because 10D and 20D are both good cameras. Given that you have $2000 cap, I will get 10D and get 70-200 mm F2.8 L lens. It does not need to have an IS feature. It will probably will cost you about $2400 but I think it will be a good investment in long run. I wasted money on lenses because I didn't know any better. Also, if the price is too good to be true, be aware!!!

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    nevada county, cal.
    Posts
    2

    Re: Starting out as a sports photographer

    I'm considering the 10d versus 20d for sport....My biggest concern is "the follow focus" with these 2 cameras....What do you think? Is the 10d adequate for good sport shots ?


    Thanks for your thoughts

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    From
    Posts
    332

    Re: Starting out as a sports photographer

    I'm about to purchase a 20D myself along with a lens for sports. I'm going with this: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...#goto_itemInfo canon 70 to 300 with image stabilization.

    I know there is 1.6 magnification on the 20D but I'm still looking for a longer lens than 200mm. I could always use a converter but then I loose the F stop that the 200mm gives me making it pointless. The 70 - 300 also has image stabilization which although making it heavy is great.

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Miami Shores, FL, US
    Posts
    8

    Re: Starting out as a sports photographer

    Quote Originally Posted by jorge velasquez
    I'm considering the 10d versus 20d for sport....My biggest concern is "the follow focus" with these 2 cameras....What do you think? Is the 10d adequate for good sport shots ?


    Thanks for your thoughts
    If by "follow focus" you mean AI Servo, then yes the 10D does a great job at it. Both the 20D and 10D have AI Servo in which the camera will continuously focus on the moving object inside the frame and attempt to keep it in focus. I love using this feature on my 20D

  9. #9
    Captain of the Ship Photo-John's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
    Posts
    15,422

    10D vs 20D

    I have a Canon 10D and an EOS 1D. While I've shot a lot of great photos with the 10D, I've also been very frustrated with the AF accuracy. The AI Servo is fine, it's getting it to accurately focus on small subjects that's been the problem. It sounds like people shooting team sports haven't had this problem, though. I shoot mostly mountain biking and like big open images with tiny subjects. You probably won't want to shoot like that when you're shooting soccer. As far as the 10D vs the 20D goes, for my purposes, the 20D is definitely a big improvement. I haven't used it, but I've been asking other photographers I know who shoot the same stuff I do, and have used both. The 20D is both faster and more accurate. Understand, I'm not knocking the 10D. For most people it's probably more than enough. But I'm spoiled by the awesome AF on my 1D, and the type of photos I like to shoot are a problem. So if you can afford a 20D, that would be the right thing to do. If not, the 10D is definitely a great camera. I still have mine and am not planning to replace it any time soon.
    Photo-John

    Your reviews are the foundation of this site - Write A Review!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Need Help With Outdoor Studio Set Up For Individual Sports Photography
    By smallfrypics.com in forum Studio & Lighting
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-03-2004, 06:48 PM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-22-2004, 03:27 PM
  3. I wasn't the photographer :(
    By Hodgy in forum ViewFinder
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-15-2004, 06:10 AM
  4. Tried my hand at a little sports photography...
    By back_packn in forum Sports Photography
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-31-2004, 01:06 PM
  5. The new king of sports photo equipment
    By Photo-John in forum Sports Photography
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-17-2004, 04:05 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •